Intraperitoneal drug delivery of antineoplastics

被引:42
作者
Markman, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Med Hematol Oncol, Cleveland Clin Taussig Canc Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00003495-200161080-00003
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The administration of antineoplastic agents directly into the peritoneal cavity as treatment of localised cancer is based on sound pharmacokinetic principles. This unique technique has to the potential to optimise outcome in settings where preclinical and clinical data suggest that cytotoxicity of a specific drug against a particular tumour type is enhanced by either increasing the drug concentration or duration of exposure. Phase I trials have confirmed the safety and pharmacokinetic advantage for a number of agents delivered by the intraperitoneal relative to the systemic route. including cisplatin (10- to 20-fold advantage for regional delivery), carboplatin (10- to 20-fold advantage), and paclitaxel (1000-fold advantage). In phase II trials. performed mostly in patients with ovarian cancer, this approach has achieved objective responses in settings where intravenous drug delivery has not achieved the desired effect (e.g. surgically documented complete response using intraperitoneal cisplatin as second-line therapy of ovarian cancer). Phase III trials employing intraperitoneal cisplatin as initial treatment of small volume advanced ovarian cancer have demonstrated that regional therapy results in a modest, but statistically significant, improvement in both progression-free and overall survival compared to intravenous cisplatin. Further exploration of this novel method of treatment, including the conduct of definitive randomised phase III clinical trials, is indicated in ovarian cancer and in other tumour types where clinical manifestations are principally localised to the peritoneal cavity.
引用
收藏
页码:1057 / 1065
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
ALBERTS DS, 1985, SEMIN ONCOL, V12, P38
[2]   Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer [J].
Alberts, DS ;
Liu, PY ;
Hannigan, EV ;
OToole, R ;
Williams, SD ;
Young, JA ;
Franklin, EW ;
ClarkePearson, DL ;
Malviya, VK ;
DuBeshter, B ;
Adelson, MD ;
Hoskins, WJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (26) :1950-1955
[3]   A phase II trial of intraperitoneal cisplatin and etoposide as consolidation therapy in patients with stage II-IV epithelial ovarian cancer following negative surgical assessment [J].
Barakat, RR ;
Almadrones, L ;
Venkatraman, ES ;
Aghajanian, C ;
Brown, C ;
Shapiro, F ;
Curtin, JP ;
Spriggs, D .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1998, 69 (01) :17-22
[4]   Intraperitoneal interferon-α in residual ovarian carcinoma:: A Phase II Gynecologic Oncology Group study [J].
Berek, JS ;
Markman, M ;
Stonebraker, B ;
Lentz, SS ;
Adelson, MD ;
DeGeest, K ;
Moore, D .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1999, 75 (01) :10-14
[5]   MEDICAL PROGRESS - CANCER OF THE OVARY [J].
CANNISTRA, SA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 329 (21) :1550-1559
[6]  
CASPER ES, 1983, CANCER TREAT REP, V67, P325
[7]  
Clarke M, 1998, LANCET, V351, P1451
[8]   Pharmacokinetic problems in peritoneal drug administration: Tissue penetration and surface exposure [J].
Dedrick, RL ;
Flessner, MF .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (07) :480-487
[9]  
DEDRICK RL, 1978, CANCER TREAT REP, V62, P1
[10]  
DEGREGORIO MW, 1986, CANCER CHEMOTH PHARM, V18, P235