Relation of disability costs to function: Spinal cord injury

被引:39
作者
Hamilton, BB
Deutsch, A
Russell, C
Fiedler, RC
Granger, CV
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Rehabil Med, Ctr Funct Assessment Res, Buffalo, NY 14214 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Geriatr, Durham, NC USA
[3] Youville Coll, Div Rehabil Sci, Buffalo, NY USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 1999年 / 80卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90274-5
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: This study evaluated the validity of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM(TM) instrument) in predicting (1) the number of minutes of daily assistance provided, (2) the cost of durable goods currently used, and (3) the number of paid helper hours provided daily to persons with spinal cord injury living in the community. Design: A cross-sectional study. Subjects: One hundred nine persons with spinal cord injury who were a median 6 years postdischarge from initial medical rehabilitation. Results: A significant inverse linear relationship was observed between FIM scores and the square root values of the three cost-related measures. The FIM-18 and the FIM motor scores were the best single predictors of the square root of minutes of assistance (paid and/or unpaid) per day, explaining 85% of variance. The FIM motor measure was the best single predictor of square root of cost of durable goods, explaining 29% of variance. The Self-Care, FIM motor, and FIM-ls scores equally predicted square root of hours of paid help per day, explaining 58% of variance. Conclusion: The findings indicate FIM-related scores pre diet the amount of assistance needed and certain costs for persons with spinal cord injury disability. (C) 1999 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 391
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1980, International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps
[2]  
BERKOWITZ M, EC CONSEQUENCES TRAU
[3]  
Chau N, 1994, Disabil Rehabil, V16, P63
[4]   Validity of the functional independence measure for persons with traumatic brain injury [J].
Corrigan, JD ;
SmithKnapp, K ;
Granger, CV .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1997, 78 (08) :828-834
[5]   FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME IN CHILDREN WITH TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY - AGREEMENT BETWEEN CLINICAL JUDGMENT AND THE FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE [J].
DISCALA, C ;
GRANT, CC ;
BROOKE, MM ;
GANS, BM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1992, 71 (03) :145-148
[6]  
DISLER PB, 1993, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V74, P139
[7]   A VALIDATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASUREMENT AND ITS PERFORMANCE AMONG REHABILITATION INPATIENTS [J].
DODDS, TA ;
MARTIN, DP ;
STOLOV, WC ;
DEYO, RA .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1993, 74 (05) :531-536
[8]  
Fiedler R.C., 1996, Functional Evaluation of Stroke Patients, P75
[9]   REHABITS - A COMMON LANGUAGE OF FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT [J].
FISHER, WP ;
HARVEY, RF ;
TAYLOR, P ;
KILGORE, KM ;
KELLY, CK .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1995, 76 (02) :113-122
[10]   THE USE OF FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT IN UNDERSTANDING HOME CARE NEEDS [J].
FORTINSKY, RH ;
GRANGER, CV ;
SELTZER, GB .
MEDICAL CARE, 1981, 19 (05) :489-497