The value of an in-hospital insect sting challenge as a criterion for application or omission of venom immunotherapy

被引:32
作者
Blaauw, PJ
Smithuis, OLMJ
Elbers, ARW
机构
[1] ELKERLIEK HOSP, NL-5707 HA HELMOND, NETHERLANDS
[2] ANIM HLTH SERV, EPIDEMIOL UNIT, BOXTEL, NETHERLANDS
关键词
insect sting challenge; hymenoptera allergy; venom immunotherapy; field sting;
D O I
10.1016/S0091-6749(96)70224-5
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Venom immunotherapy is a generally accepted treatment for serious allergy to bee and yellow jacket venom. However, It is not precisely known to whom venom immunotherapy should be offered. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether an in-hospital insect sting challenge (IHC) can be used as a criterion for application or omission of venom immunotherapy. Methods: An IHC was carried out in a group of 479 patients (136 sensitized to bee venom and 343 sensitized to yellow jacket venom). The patients with a negative IHC response were interviewed about their experience with subsequent stings under natural circumstances. Results: A total of 76 of 136 bee-sensitized patients (56%) and 284 of 343 yellow jacket-sensitized patients (83%) had a negative IHC response. All of the patients who had a systemic reaction after the IHC were advised to receive venom immunotherapy. The success rate of this therapy was 96.4% for patients allergic to bee venom (54 of 56) and 91.4% for patients allergic to yellow jacket venom (53 of 58). Of a total of 76 bee-sensitized patients with negative IHC responses, 41 were subsequently stung in the field; six patients had a mild (Mueller grade I) systemic reaction (14.6%). Of a total of 284 yellow jacket-sensitized with negative IHC responses, 127 were subsequently stung in the field; nine patients had a mild (Mueller grade I) systemic reaction (14.6%). Of a total of 284 yellow jacket-sensitized with negative IHC responses, 127 were subsequently string in the field; nine patients had a mild (Mueller grades I and II) systemic reaction (7.1%), and four patients had a severe (Mueller grades III and IV) systemic reaction (3.1%). Without IHC as a selection criterion for venom immunotherapy, the percentage of patients unnecessarily treated was calculated to be 48% for bee venom-sensitized patients and 74% for yellow jacket-sensitized patients. However, with a negative test IHC response as a selection criterion for the omission of venom immunotherapy, 14.6% of the bee venom-sensitized patients and 10.2% of the yellow jacket-sensitized patients were proven to be at risk for systemic reactions on subsequent field stings. Conclusion: Venom immunotherapy with bee or yellow jacket venom is justifiable only after a positive response to an IHC is observed.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 47
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, INSECT STING ALLERGY
[2]  
BLAAUW PJ, 1986, ALLERGOLOGIE, V9, pS81
[3]   THE EVALUATION OF THE COMMON DIAGNOSTIC METHODS OF HYPERSENSITIVITY FOR BEE AND YELLOW JACKET VENOM BY MEANS OF AN IN-HOSPITAL INSECT STING [J].
BLAAUW, PJ ;
SMITHUIS, LOMJ .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1985, 75 (05) :556-562
[4]   INSECT STING ANAPHYLAXIS IN PATIENTS WITHOUT DETECTABLE SERUM VENOM-SPECIFIC IGE [J].
CLAYTON, WF ;
GEORGITIS, JW ;
REISMAN, RE .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1983, 71 (01) :141-141
[5]  
FORSTER J, 1991, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, V87, P238, DOI 10.1016/0091-6749(91)91676-K
[6]   LACK OF REPRODUCIBILITY OF A SINGLE NEGATIVE STING CHALLENGE RESPONSE IN THE ASSESSMENT OF ANAPHYLACTIC RISK IN PATIENTS WITH SUSPECTED YELLOW JACKET HYPERSENSITIVITY [J].
FRANKEN, HH ;
DUBOIS, AEJ ;
MINKEMA, HJ ;
VANDERHEIDE, S ;
DEMONCHY, JGR .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1994, 93 (02) :431-436
[7]   CLINICAL CORRELATION OF THE VENOM-SPECIFIC IGG ANTIBODY LEVEL DURING MAINTENANCE VENOM IMMUNOTHERAPY [J].
GOLDEN, DBK ;
LAWRENCE, ID ;
HAMILTON, RH ;
KAGEYSOBOTKA, A ;
VALENTINE, MD ;
LICHTENSTEIN, LM .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1992, 90 (03) :386-393
[8]  
HAUK P, 1990, Clinical and Experimental Allergy, V20, P112
[9]  
HENOCQ E, 1982, ANN M EAACI 1981 CLE, V2, P886
[10]   PROVOCATION TEST WITH A LIVING INSECT AS A DIAGNOSTIC-TOOL IN SYSTEMIC REACTIONS TO BEE AND WASP VENOM - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY WITH EMPHASIS ON THE CLINICAL ASPECTS [J].
KAMPELMACHER, MJ ;
VANDERZWAN, JC .
CLINICAL ALLERGY, 1987, 17 (04) :317-327