Conflict over biomass energy development in the United Kingdom: some observations and lessons from England and Wales

被引:143
作者
Upreti, BR [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Sch Social Sci & Publ Policy, Kings Ctr Risk Management, London WC2R 2LS, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
biomass; conflict; energy and public;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00342-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to examine the causes of conflict over biomass energy development in the United Kingdom. This paper discusses social dimensions of development of biomass power plants. Based on the four case studies from England and Wales this paper examines impacts of public oppositions on planning permission. This paper revels that public opposition is one of the major obstacles to promote biomass energy. Though local communities value environmental benefits of biomass energy, they concern more on the immediate negative local effects of power plants to their areas. Main sources of public conflict over biomass energy development were related to location of the plant, perceived risks, and negative effects to ecology and landscape compared to few economic benefits to local people. Other factors contributing to the conflict were feeling of injustice, weak public relation strategy of the developers and low level of awareness. The paper concludes that biomass energy can be promoted only if all actors: the central government, developers, local councils, environmental concern groups and local communities make collective efforts. Such collaborative efforts need drastic shift in the current approach of biomass energy development. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 800
页数:16
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
BIRMINGHAM K, 2000, LOCAL ENVIRON, V5, P55
[2]  
BOHOLM A, 2000, RISKS RATIONALITIES
[3]  
Denzin N.K., 1998, STRATEGIES QUALITATI
[4]  
Devine-Wright P, 2001, OLD WORLD - NEW IDEAS: ENVIRONMENT AND CHANGE AND TRADITION IN A SHRINKING WORLD, PROCEEDINGS, P133
[5]  
*DTI, 2000, NEW REN EN PROSP 21
[6]  
*DTLR, 2001, NEW PARL PROC PROC M
[7]  
EDELSTEIN MR, 2001, INNOVATION SITING DI
[8]  
*ETSU DTI, 2001, SUMM FIN REP REN EN
[9]  
*EUR COMM, 2000, TRUSTNET FRAMEWORK N
[10]  
Hargreaves D, 1996, INVESTIGATION RISK C