Cesarean delivery and subsequent pregnancies

被引:74
作者
Daltveit, Anne Kjersti
Tollanes, Mette Christophersen
Pihlstrom, Rege
Irgens, Lorentz M.
机构
[1] Univ Bergen, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Hlth Care, Bergen, Norway
[2] Univ Bergen, Locus Registry Based Epidemiol, Med Birth Registry Norway, Bergen, Norway
[3] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181744110
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To assess possible effects of a cesarean delivery on outcome in subsequent pregnancies. METHODS: Using an historical cohort design, we analyzed 637,497 first and second births among women with two or more single births and 242,812 first, second, and third births among women with three or more single births registered in the population-based Medical Birth Registry of Norway between 1967 and 2003. RESULTS: Compared with a vaginal delivery at first birth, a cesarean delivery at first birth was followed, in a second pregnancy, by increased risks of preeclampsia (odds ratio [OR] 2.9 and corresponding 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8-3.1), small for gestational age (OR 1.5; CI 1.4-1.5), placenta previa (OR 1.5; Cl 1.3-1.8, placenta accreta (OR 1.9; CI 1.3-2.8), placental abruption (OR 2.0; Cl 1.8-2.2), and uterine rupture (OR 37.4; Cl 24.9-56.2). After excluding women with the actual complication at first birth, the corresponding ORs were, in general, lower: 1.7 (CI 1.6-1.8), 1.3 (CI 1.3-1.4), 1.4 (CI 1.2-1.7), 1.9 (CI 1.3-2.8), 1.7 (CI 1.6-1.9), and 37.2 (CI 24.7-55.9), respectively. Corresponding reduction in numbers of cesarean deliveries needed to prevent one case were 114, 56, 1,140, 3,706, 300, and 461. In third births, ORs after repeat cesarean delivery were similar to or lower than the ORs after one cesarean delivery; also here, the exclusion of women with the actual outcome in any of their previous pregnancies tended to reduce the ORs. CONCLUSION: Cesarean delivery was associated with an increased risk of complications in a subsequent pregnancy, but excess risks were reduced after excluding women with the actual complication in any of their previous births. To obtain less biased effects of cesarean delivery on subsequent pregnancies, it is important to account for obstetric history.
引用
收藏
页码:1327 / 1334
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Recurrence of ischemic placental disease [J].
Ananth, Cande V. ;
Peltier, Morgan R. ;
Chavez, Martin R. ;
Kirby, Russell S. ;
Getahun, Darios ;
Vintzileos, Anthony M. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 110 (01) :128-133
[2]   The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: A metaanalysis [J].
Ananth, CV ;
Smulian, JC ;
Vintzileos, AM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (05) :1071-1078
[3]  
[Anonymous], MED BIRTH REGISTRY N
[4]   Calculating the "number needed to be exposed" with adjustment for confounding variables in epidemiological studies [J].
Bender, R ;
Blettner, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 55 (05) :525-530
[5]   Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption [J].
Getahun, Darios ;
Oyelese, Yinka ;
Salihu, Hamisu M. ;
Ananth, Cande V. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 107 (04) :771-778
[6]   The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity [J].
Gilliam, M ;
Rosenberg, D ;
Davis, F .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (06) :976-980
[7]   Vaginal birth after cesarean and uterine rupture rates in California [J].
Gregory, KD ;
Korst, LM ;
Cane, P ;
Platt, LD ;
Kahn, K .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 94 (06) :985-989
[8]   Mode of delivery and problems in subsequent births: A register-based study from Finland [J].
Hemminki, E ;
Shelley, J ;
Gisster, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (01) :169-177
[9]   Impact of Caesarean section on future pregnancy - A review of cohort studies [J].
Hemminki, E .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 10 (04) :366-379
[10]   The Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Epidemiological research and surveillance throughout 30 years [J].
Irgens, LM .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 79 (06) :435-439