The impact of a positive crossmatch upon outcome after liver transplantation

被引:35
作者
Goggins, WC
Fisher, RA
Kimball, PM
Wolfe, L
Hill, BE
Pietruszka, TD
Shiffman, ML
Sanyal, AJ
Luketic, VAC
Ham, JM
Posner, MP
机构
[1] VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIV,MED COLL VIRGINIA,DEPT SURG,DIV TRANSPLNAT SURG,RICHMOND,VA 23298
[2] VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIV,MED COLL VIRGINIA,DEPT INTERNAL MED,RICHMOND,VA 23298
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00007890-199612270-00019
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Recent reports have shown that liver allografts transplanted against a positive lymphocytotoxic crossmatch (CDC+) are susceptible to an increased frequency of rejection, and decreases in patient and graft survival, The implication of a positive flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM(+)) in liver transplantation remains controversial, The purpose of this study was to determine what impact a pretransplant IgG crossmatch due to CDC+ or FCXM(+) had upon the clinical outcome following liver transplantation. Preoperative crossmatch status was determined prospectively in 110 consecutive liver transplants performed between July 1991 and January 1995, Allografts were divided into three groups: negative crossmatch (NXM), positive flow cytometric crossmatch FCXM(+), and positive lymphocytotoxic crossmatch CDC+, Crossmatch status did not impact patient or graft survival, Actuarial patient survival was similar between groups at 12 months (88% vs, 95% vs, 92% NXM vs. FCXM(+) vs. CDC+) and 24 months (81% vs, 93% vs. 92%, NXM vs. FCXM(+) vs. CDC+) (P=0.1938). Actuarial allograft survival was similar between groups at 12 months (76% vs, 93% vs. 85%, NXM vs. FCXM(+) vs. CDC+) and 24 months (76% vs. 89% vs. 85%, NXM vs. FCXM(+) vs. CDC+) (P=0.0738), CDC+ allografts had a significant increase in early rejection episodes compared with NXM (46% vs. 7%, CDC+ vs. NXM) (P=0.003) or FCXM(+) allografts (46% vs. 10%, CDC+ vs. FCXM(+)) (P=0.006), CDC+ allografts experienced significantly more rejection episodes per year than NXM (53% vs. 20%, CDC+ vs. NXM) (P=0.015) or FCXM(+) allografts (53% vs. 23%, CDC+ vs. FCXM(+)) (P=0.02), CDC+ allografts had a significant increase in numbers of additional nonconventional therapeutic interventions compared to NXM allografts (0.9+/-0.5 vs. 0.2+/-0.1, CDC+ vs. NXM) (P=0.039). The presence of cytotoxic antibodies pretransplantation is associated with increased incidences of early rejection, and rejection episodes per year, With careful monitoring and aggressive therapeutic interventions the presence of cytotoxic antibodies are not deleterious to patient or liver allograft survival.
引用
收藏
页码:1794 / 1798
页数:5
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   INFLUENCE OF POSITIVE LYMPHOCYTE CROSSMATCH AND HLA MISMATCHING ON VANISHING BILE-DUCT SYNDROME IN HUMAN-LIVER ALLOGRAFTS [J].
BATTS, KP ;
MOORE, SB ;
PERKINS, JD ;
WIESNER, RH ;
GRAMBSCH, PM ;
KROM, RAF .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1988, 45 (02) :376-379
[2]  
BIRD G, 1989, TRANSPLANT P, V21, P3742
[3]  
CHAPMAN JR, 1985, TRANSPLANT P, V17, P248
[4]  
COOK DJ, 1987, CLIN TRANSPLANT, V1, P253
[5]   A CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY OF HUMAN LIVER ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS HARBORING PREFORMED IGG LYMPHOCYTOTOXIC ANTIBODIES [J].
DEMETRIS, AJ ;
NAKAMURA, K ;
YAGIHASHI, A ;
IWAKI, Y ;
TAKAYA, S ;
HARTMAN, GG ;
MURASE, N ;
BRONSTHER, O ;
MANEZ, R ;
FUNG, JJ ;
IWATSUKI, S ;
STARZL, TE .
HEPATOLOGY, 1992, 16 (03) :671-681
[6]   INTRAOBSERVER AND INTEROBSERVER VARIATION IN THE HISTOPATHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF LIVER ALLOGRAFT-REJECTION [J].
DEMETRIS, AJ ;
BELLE, SH ;
HART, J ;
LEWIN, K ;
LUDWIG, J ;
SNOVER, DC ;
TILLERY, GW ;
DETRE, K .
HEPATOLOGY, 1991, 14 (05) :751-755
[7]   IGG DONOR-SPECIFIC CROSS-MATCHES ARE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH GRAFT-REJECTION OR POOR GRAFT-SURVIVAL AFTER LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION - AN ASSESSMENT BY CYTOTOXICITY AND FLOW-CYTOMETRY [J].
DONALDSON, PT ;
THOMSON, LJ ;
HEADS, A ;
UNDERHILL, JA ;
VAUGHAN, RW ;
ROLANDO, N ;
WILLIAMS, R .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1995, 60 (09) :1016-1023
[8]  
DONALDSON PT, 1987, LANCET, V1, P945
[9]  
EID A, 1990, TRANSPLANTATION, V50, P331
[10]  
Fisher R A, 1994, Transplant Sci, V4 Suppl 1, pS1