The irrationality paradox

被引：22

作者：

Gigerenzer, G ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, D-14195 Berlin, Germany

来源：

BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES | 2004年 / 27卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1017/S0140525X04310083

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

In the study of judgmental errors, surprisingly little thought is spent on what constitutes good and bad judgment. I call this simultaneous focus on errors and lack of analysis of what constitutes an error, the irrationality paradox. I illustrate the paradox by a dozen apparent fallacies; each can be logically deduced from the environmental structure and air unbiased mind.

引用

页码：336 / +

页数：13

共 38 条

[1]

Anderson JR, 1990, ADAPTIVE CHARACTER T

[2]

[Anonymous], 1999, Simple heuristics that make us smart

[3]

[Anonymous], 1992, ADAPTED MIND EVOLUTI

[4] The false consensus effect and overconfidence: Flaws in judgment or flaws in how we study judgment? [J].