Comparing the stock recommendation performance of investment banks and independent research firms

被引:137
作者
Barber, Brad M.
Lehavy, Reuven
Trueman, Brett [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Anderson Sch Management, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Grad Sch Management, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Ross Sch Business, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
analyst; recommendation; investment bank; independent research; global research analyst settlement;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.09.004
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
From January 1996 through June 2003, the average daily abnormal return to independent research firm buy recommendations exceeds that of investment bank buy recommendations by 3.1 basis points (almost 8 percentage points annualized). Investment bank buy recommendation underperformance is more pronounced following the NASDAQ market peak (March 10, 2000) and strikingly so for buy recommendations on firms that recently conducted equity offerings. In contrast, investment bank hold and sell recommendations outperform those of independent research firms by 1.8 basis points daily (4 1/2 percentage points annualized). These results suggest reluctance by investment banks to downgrade stocks whose prospects dimmed during the bear market of the early 2000s, as claimed in the SEC's Global Research Analyst Settlement. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 517
页数:28
相关论文
共 20 条