Relationship between the expression of various markers and prognostic factors in breast cancer

被引:31
作者
Anim, JT [1 ]
John, B
Abdulsathar, SA
Prasad, A
Saji, T
Akhtar, N
Ali, V
Al-Saleh, M
机构
[1] Kuwait Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, Safat 13110, Kuwait
[2] Kuwait Univ, Fac Med, Dept Surg, Safat 13110, Kuwait
关键词
breast cancer; markers; immunohistochemistry; prognostic factors;
D O I
10.1016/j.acthis.2005.01.002
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The immunohistochemical detection of six markers of breast cancer has been compared in the present study with known prognostic factors of the disease to establish locally a standard panel of markers for the management of breast cancer. Sections of tissue of 114 consecutive breast cancer cases were studied immunohistochemically, using antibodies against oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), androgen receptor, c-erbB2, cathepsin D, and cychn D. Marker labelling was graded as recommended in the literature. Using the chi(2)-test, relationships were determined between marker labelling and histological type of cancer, tumour grade, tumour size, axillary lymph node status and age of patient. A p value below 0.05 was considered significant. A positive relationship was found between ER and PR and lower grades of cancer, and a negative relationship was found with medullary and atypical medullary carcinoma. The four other markers showed no relationship with grade or type of cancer. All. markers showed no significant relationship with size of tumour, presence of axittary node metastasis or age of patient. There was positive correlation between c-erbB2 and cathepsin D. Our study confirms the association between ER and PR and histological type and grade of breast cancer, both known parameters of good prognosis. We found no consistent relationship between the other four markers and prognostic factors studied, other than the suggestion that c-erbB2 and cathepsin D may be useful markers for poor prognosis and can be usefully applied locally, especially in the tight of the current availability of trastuzumab (Herceptin) for management of c-erbB2- positive cases. We found no relationship between the markers and tumour size, axittary lymph node status or age. (c) 2005 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 93
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
ANDEA AA, 2002, CANCER, V97, P1383
[2]   A review of the welfare issues for sows and piglets in relation to housing [J].
Barnett, JL ;
Hemsworth, PH ;
Cronin, GM ;
Jongman, EC ;
Hutson, GD .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2001, 52 (01) :1-28
[3]  
Clark, 1995, Breast Cancer, V2, P79, DOI 10.1007/BF02966945
[4]   Risk factors for breast cancer according to estrogen and progesterone receptor status [J].
Colditz, GA ;
Rosner, BA ;
Chen, WY ;
Holmes, MD ;
Hankinson, SE .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (03) :218-228
[5]   PATHOLOGICAL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN BREAST-CANCER .1. THE VALUE OF HISTOLOGICAL GRADE IN BREAST-CANCER - EXPERIENCE FROM A LARGE STUDY WITH LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP [J].
ELSTON, CW ;
ELLIS, IO .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 1991, 19 (05) :403-410
[6]   Lymphatic invasion, tumor size, and age are independent predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in women with T1 breast cancers [J].
Gajdos, C ;
Tartter, PI ;
Bleiweiss, IJ .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 230 (05) :692-696
[7]  
HARRIS JR, 2000, DIS BREAST, P490
[8]   WHY DO SO MANY PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FAIL TO PAN OUT [J].
HILSENBECK, SG ;
CLARK, GM ;
MCGUIRE, WL .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1992, 22 (03) :197-206
[9]  
Holli K, 1997, EUR J CANCER, V33, P425
[10]  
HOPP T, 1999, J MAMMARY GLAND NEOP, V3, P73