The value of the CAGE in screening for alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence in general clinical populations: a diagnostic meta-analysis

被引:95
作者
Aertgeerts, B
Buntinx, F
Kester, A
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Gen Practice, Clin Epidemiol Unit, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Maastricht, Dept Methodol & Stat, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Maastricht, Dept Gen Practice, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] CEBAM, Belgian Branch Cochrane Collaborat, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
meta-analysis; alcohol abuse; alcohol dependence; CAGE questionnaire; ROC curves; medical clinical populations;
D O I
10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00254-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To perform a meta-analysis to assess diagnostic characteristics of the CAGE in screening for alcohol abuse or dependence in a general clinical population and to test a new method for pooling of ROC curves. Methods: Medline search performed over the period 1/1/1974 to 31/12/2001. Measurement: Calculation of diagnostic values. Results: We identified 35 articles using the DSM criteria as the gold standard to test the diagnostic value of the CAGE. Only 10 studies could be included for the meta-analysis. With a cutoff point greater than or equal to2, the pooled sensitivity is far better in inpatients (0.87) than in primary care patients (0.71) or ambulatory patients (0.60). The pooled specificity also differs for each group. The likelihood ratios seem to be relatively constant over the populations (overall LR+:3.44;LR-:0.18). We calculated a pooled AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.89). At low specificity values, the sensitivity was homogenous over the studies, and at a low sensitivity, the specificity was heterogenous. Conclusion: The diagnostic value of the CAGE is of limited value using this test for screening purposes at his recommended cutpoint of greater than or equal to2. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 39
页数:10
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   ALCOHOL-ABUSE IN ELDERLY EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PATIENTS [J].
ADAMS, WL ;
MAGRUDERHABIB, K ;
TRUED, S ;
BROOME, HL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1992, 40 (12) :1236-1240
[2]   Is there a difference between CAGE interviews and written CAGE questionnaires? [J].
Aertgeerts, B ;
Buntinx, F ;
Fevery, J ;
Ansoms, S .
ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 24 (05) :733-736
[3]   Questionnaires are better than laboratory tests to screen for current alcohol abuse or dependence in a male inpatient population [J].
Aertgeerts, B ;
Buntinx, F ;
Ansoms, S ;
Fevery, J .
ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2002, 57 (05) :241-249
[4]  
Aertgeerts B, 2001, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V51, P206
[5]  
AERTGEERTS B, 2000, TIJDSCHR GENEESKD, V56, P177
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Am J Public Health, V86, P948
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1987, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, V4th
[8]   COMPARISON OF CAGE QUESTIONNAIRE AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED LABORATORY PROFILES IN SCREENING FOR COVERT ALCOHOLISM [J].
BERESFORD, TP ;
BLOW, FC ;
HILL, E ;
SINGER, K ;
LUCEY, MR .
LANCET, 1990, 336 (8713) :482-485
[9]   Variations on the CAGE alcohol screening questionnaire: Strengths and limitations in VA general medical patients [J].
Bradley, KA ;
Kivlahan, DR ;
Bush, KR ;
McDonell, MB ;
Fihn, SD .
ALCOHOL-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 25 (10) :1472-1478
[10]  
Brown R L, 1995, Wis Med J, V94, P135