Genetic correlations with floral display lead to sexual dimorphism in the cost of reproduction

被引:71
作者
Delph, LF [1 ]
Gehring, JL [1 ]
Arntz, AM [1 ]
Levri, M [1 ]
Frey, FM [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Biol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
artificial selection; correlated responses; dioecy; genetic correlations; sexual selection; Silene latifolia;
D O I
10.1086/444597
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In dioecious plants, females typically invest more biomass in reproduction than males and consequently experience stronger life-history trade-offs. Sexual dimorphism in life history runs counter to this pattern in Silene latifolia: females acquire less carbon and invest more biomass in reproduction, but males pay a higher cost of reproduction. The species is sexually dimorphic for many traits, especially flower number, with males producing many, small flowers compared to females. We tested whether the cost of reproduction is higher in males because flower number, which we presume to be under sexual selection in males, is genetically correlated with traits that would affect life-history trade-offs. We performed artificial selection to reduce the sexual dimorphism in flower size and looked at correlated responses in ecophysiological traits. We found significant correlated responses in total vegetative mass, leaf mass, leaf thickness, and measures of CO2 exchange. Individuals in the many-and-small-flowered selection lines did not grow as large or invest as much biomass in leaves, and their leaves exhibited an up-regulated physiology that shortened leaf life span. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that genetic correlations between floral display and ecophysiological traits lead to a higher cost of reproduction for males.
引用
收藏
页码:S31 / S41
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: A comparative test using independent contrasts [J].
Ackerly, DD ;
Reich, PB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1999, 86 (09) :1272-1281
[2]  
Ackerly DD, 2000, BIOSCIENCE, V50, P979, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0979:TEOPET]2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1972, SEXUAL SELECTION DES
[5]   CONSTRAINTS ON PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION [J].
ARNOLD, SJ .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1992, 140 :S85-S107
[6]   QUANTITATIVE GENETIC MODELS OF SEXUAL SELECTION [J].
ARNOLD, SJ .
EXPERIENTIA, 1985, 41 (10) :1296-1310
[7]  
Arnold Stean J., 1994, P17
[8]   Pattern and process: evidence for the evolution of photosynthetic traits in natural populations [J].
Arntz, AM ;
Delph, LF .
OECOLOGIA, 2001, 127 (04) :455-467
[9]   STAGES IN INVASION AND REPLACEMENT DEMONSTRATED BY SPECIES OF MELANDRIUM [J].
BAKER, HG .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1948, 36 (01) :96-119
[10]   THE COSTS OF REPRODUCTION AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES [J].
BELL, G .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1980, 116 (01) :45-76