Comparison of Peditrol® irrigation device and common methods of irrigation

被引:27
作者
Blew, BDM
Dagnone, AJ
Pace, KT
Honey, RJD
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Div Urol, Dept Surg, St Michaels Hosp, Toronto, ON M5C 2T2, Canada
[2] Queensway Profess Ctr, Etobicoke, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1089/end.2005.19.562
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: The Peditrol (R) is a novel hands-free irrigation device that delivers a bolus of irrigant through the ureteroscope when the foot pedal is deployed. The purpose of this study was to compare the flow and pressures created by the Peditrol with those of commonly used methods of irrigation. Materials and Methods: Flows through a flexible 6.9F Olympus ureteroscope (F-URS) and a 7.5F semirigid ACMI ureteroscope (S-URS) were measured in duplicate with the working channel empty and with a 2.2F Nitinol basket or a laser fiber in the working port. Irrigant flow was pressurized by gravity drainage at 100 cm H2O (GI), pressurized irrigant bag at 300 cm H2O (PI), handheld 60-cc syringe (HS), and the Peditrol. A 20-gauge angiocatheter was placed through the parenchyma into the renal pelvis of an ex-vivo cadaveric porcine kidney and attached to a pressure transducer. Pressures were measured in triplicate using the same irrigation techniques. Results: With a basket or 200-mu m laser fiber in the working port of the F-URS, Peditrol mean flows were superior to those of PI (3.3 and 6.3 times, respectively; P < 0.001) but similar to those of HS (0.7 to 1.1 times). All irrigation types resulted in intrarenal pressures greater than gravity irrigation (P < 0.05). The Peditrol demonstrated intrapelvic pressures < 40 cm H2O when used with a 12/14F ureteral access sheath (AS). Without an AS, the intrapelvic pressure reached 92 cm H2O, similar to the pressures reached with the S-URS under various irrigation conditions (84-287 cm H2O) and comparable to the HS method through the F-URS (97 cm H2O) Conclusions: The Peditrol irrigation device generates superior flow through an F-URS compared with GI or PI, particularly with an instrument in the working port. Intrarenal pressures when used with an F-URS and AS are low. When an AS is not used, the intrarenal pressure is similar to or lower than pressures obtained using an S-URS with different irrigation modalities.
引用
收藏
页码:562 / 565
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation [J].
Auge, BK ;
Pietrow, PK ;
Lallas, CD ;
Raj, GV ;
Santa-Cruz, RW ;
Preminger, GM .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2004, 18 (01) :33-36
[2]   Fluid absorption during ureterorenoscopy [J].
Cybulski, P ;
Honey, RJD ;
Pace, K .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2004, 18 (08) :739-742
[3]  
GABE R, 1978, INVEST RADIOL, V14, P318
[4]   Pyelovenous back flow [J].
Hinman, F ;
Redewill, FH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1926, 87 :1287-1293
[5]  
RANSLEY PG, 1974, LANCET, V2, P1114
[6]  
RANSLEY PG, 1975, UROL RES, V3, P105
[7]  
RANSLEY PG, 1975, UROL RES, V3, P111
[8]   INTRARENAL REFLUX - ANATOMICAL, DYNAMIC AND RADIOLOGICAL STUDIES .1. [J].
RANSLEY, PG .
UROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1977, 5 (02) :61-69
[9]   Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths [J].
Rehman, J ;
Monga, M ;
Landman, J ;
Lee, DI ;
Felfela, T ;
Conradie, MC ;
Srinivas, R ;
Sundaram, CP ;
Clayman, RV .
UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (04) :713-718
[10]   MORPHOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL-CHANGES IN THE URINARY-TRACT ASSOCIATED WITH URETERAL DILATION AND URETEROPYELOSCOPY - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY [J].
SCHWALB, DM ;
ESHGHI, M ;
DAVIDIAN, M ;
FRANCO, I .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 149 (06) :1576-1585