A randomised controlled trial of the outcome of health assessment of people aged 75 years and over

被引:56
作者
Newbury, JW [1 ]
Marley, JE [1 ]
Beilby, JJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Dept Gen Practice, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143541.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To measure the outcomes of a health assessment, conducted by a nurse, of people aged 75 years and older (75+HA) living independently in their own homes. Design: Randomised controlled trial (RCT). Setting: A convenience sample of six general practices within the Adelaide Western Division of General Practice (AWDGP). A random sample of 100 participants was drawn from practice age-sex registers. Data were collected in initial visits between 1 August 1998 and February 1999, then in follow-up visits one year later. Participants: Participants were aged 75 years and over on 1 August 1998 and living independently in the community. 145 eligible patients were invited to join the study, and 100 of these consented to enrol (69%). Intervention: A 75+HA conducted in the participant's home by a nurse and reported to their usual general practitioner. Main outcome measures: Primary: number of problems in each group; number of participants with problems; and mortality. Secondary: physical function; psychological (including cognitive) function; falls; and admission to institution. Results: There were no significant differences between the control and intervention groups at follow-up in the number of problems, the number of participants with problems, or mortality, In the intervention group, there was significant improvement in self-rated health, geriatric depression score (GDS 15), and number of tails. Conclusions: This RCT has not demonstrated improvement in health status of the intervention group which received a 75+HA compared with a control group left to usual care.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 107
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
*AC COORD CAR BRAN, 2000, 5 DEP HLTH AG CAR AC
[2]   The process of care in preventive in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment [J].
Alessi, CA ;
Stuck, AE ;
Aronow, HU ;
Yuhas, KE ;
Bula, CJ ;
Madison, R ;
Gold, M ;
SegalGidan, F ;
Fanello, R ;
Rubenstein, LZ ;
Beck, JC .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1997, 45 (09) :1044-1050
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach
[4]  
*AUSTR BUR STAT, 2000, CENS POP HOUS SEL CH
[5]  
*BEH EP UN, 1995, S AUSTR POP NORMS SH
[6]  
BUCKLEY EG, 1988, BRIT MED J, V296, P1145
[7]  
Büla CJ, 1999, J AM GERIATR SOC, V47, P389
[8]   A thorough going over: evidence for health assessments for older persons [J].
Byles, JE .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2000, 24 (02) :117-123
[9]  
*COMM DEP HLTH AG, 2000, MED BEN SCHED BOOK
[10]   MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN [J].
FOLSTEIN, MF ;
FOLSTEIN, SE ;
MCHUGH, PR .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) :189-198