The weakness of strong ties: Collective action failure in a highly cohesive group

被引:60
作者
Flache, A [1 ]
Macy, MW [1 ]
机构
[1] BRANDEIS UNIV,DEPT SOCIOL,WALTHAM,MA 02254
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
collective action; social control; social networks; group cohesiveness; computer simulation; stochastic learning; social dilemmas;
D O I
10.1080/0022250X.1996.9990172
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Following Homans, exchange theorists have modeled informal social control as an exchange of peer approval for compliance with group obligations. The exchange model predicts higher compliance in cohesive networks with strong social ties. However, previous specifications failed to incorporate bilateral exchange of approval. Computer simulations using a Bush-Mosteller stochastic learning model show that bilateral exchanges evolve more readily than multilateral, causing social control to flow into the maintenance of interpersonal relationships at the expense of compliance with group obligations, a structural form of the ''second-order free-rider problem.''
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 28
页数:26
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], Q J EC
[2]  
[Anonymous], PROFANE CULTURES
[3]   AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH TO NORMS [J].
AXELROD, R .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1986, 80 (04) :1095-1111
[4]   ARTIFICIAL SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE [J].
BAINBRIDGE, WS ;
BRENT, EE ;
CARLEY, KM ;
HEISE, DR ;
MACY, MW ;
MARKOVSKY, B ;
SKVORETZ, J .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1994, 20 :407-436
[5]  
Berger J., 1974, EXPECTATION STATES T
[6]  
BLAU PM, 1973, DYNAMICS BUREAUCRACY
[7]  
BUSH RR, 1955, STOCHASTIC MODELS LE
[8]  
Coleman J. S., 1994, FDN SOCIAL THEORY
[9]  
Edwards P.K., 1982, SOCIAL ORG IND CONFL
[10]  
Festinger L, 1962, THEORY COGNITIVE DIS