Mapping attractor fields in face space: the atypicality bias in face recognition

被引:73
作者
Tanaka, J [1 ]
Giles, M
Kremen, S
Simon, V
机构
[1] Oberlin Coll, Dept Psychol, Severance Lab, Oberlin, OH 44074 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Duke Univ, Durham, NC USA
关键词
face recognition; atypicality bias; attractor field; memory;
D O I
10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00048-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A familiar face can be recognized across many changes in the stimulus input. In this research, the many-to-one mapping of face stimuli to a single face memory is referred to as a face memory's 'attractor field'. According to the attractor field approach, a face memory will be activated by any stimuli falling within the boundaries of its attractor field. It was predicted that by virtue of its location in a multi-dimensional face space, the attractor field of an atypical face will be larger than the attractor field of a typical face. To test this prediction, subjects make likeness judgments to morphed faces that contained a 50/50 contribution from an atypical and a typical parent face. The main result of four experiments was that the morph face was judged to bear a stronger resemblance to the atypical face parent than the typical face parent. The computational basis of the atypicality bias was demonstrated in a neural network simulation where morph inputs of atypical and typical representations elicited stronger activation of atypical output units than of typical output units. Together, the behavioral and simulation evidence supports the view that the attractor fields of atypical faces span over a broader region of face space that the attractor fields of typical faces. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 220
页数:22
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   TYPICALITY AND FAMILIARITY OF FACES [J].
BARTLETT, JC ;
HURRY, S ;
THORLEY, W .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1984, 12 (03) :219-228
[2]   CATEGORICAL EFFECTS IN THE PERCEPTION OF FACES [J].
BEALE, JM ;
KEIL, FC .
COGNITION, 1995, 57 (03) :217-239
[3]   RECOGNITION-BY-COMPONENTS - A THEORY OF HUMAN IMAGE UNDERSTANDING [J].
BIEDERMAN, I .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1987, 94 (02) :115-147
[4]   FORTYSOMETHING - RECOGNIZING FACES AT ONES 25TH REUNION [J].
BRUCK, M ;
CAVANAGH, P ;
CECI, SJ .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1991, 19 (03) :221-228
[5]   UNDERSTANDING FACE RECOGNITION WITH AN INTERACTIVE ACTIVATION MODEL [J].
BURTON, AM ;
BRUCE, V ;
JOHNSTON, RA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 81 :361-380
[6]   Categorical perception of morphed facial expressions [J].
Calder, AJ ;
Young, AW ;
Perrett, DI ;
Etcoff, NL ;
Rowland, D .
VISUAL COGNITION, 1996, 3 (02) :81-117
[7]   WHY FACES ARE AND ARE NOT SPECIAL - AN EFFECT OF EXPERTISE [J].
DIAMOND, R ;
CAREY, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1986, 115 (02) :107-117
[8]  
Ekman P., 1972, EMOTION HUMAN FACE
[9]   CATEGORICAL PERCEPTION OF FACIAL EXPRESSIONS [J].
ETCOFF, NL ;
MAGEE, JJ .
COGNITION, 1992, 44 (03) :227-240
[10]   INFLUENCES OF CATEGORIZATION ON PERCEPTUAL DISCRIMINATION [J].
GOLDSTONE, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1994, 123 (02) :178-200