Models of e-government: Are they correct? An empirical assessment

被引:279
作者
Coursey, David
Norris, Donald F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Publ Policy, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Maryland Inst Policy Anal & Res, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00888.x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Research into e-government is relatively new. Nevertheless, much contemporary thinking and writing about e-government is driven by normative models that appeared less than a decade ago. The authors present empirical evidence from three surveys of local e-government in the United States to test whether these models are accurate or useful for understanding the actual development of e-government. They find that local e-government is mainly informational, with a few transactions but virtually no indication of the high-level functions predicted in the models. Thus, the models do not accurately describe or predict the development of e-government, at least among American local governments. These models, though intellectually interesting, are purely speculative, having been developed without linkage to the literature about information technology and government. The authors offer grounded observations about e-government that will useful to scholars and practitioners alike.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 536
页数:14
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT J ELECT GOVT RES
[2]  
[Anonymous], MUNICIPAL YB 2005
[3]  
[Anonymous], MANAGEMENT INFORM SY
[4]  
Baum C.H., 2000, GARTNERS 4 PHASES E
[5]   Organizational Adoption of Microcomputer Technology: The Role of Sector [J].
Bretschneider, Stuart ;
Wittmer, Dennis .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1993, 4 (01) :88-108
[6]  
Coursey D., 2001, HDB PUBLIC INFORM SY, P331
[7]  
COURSEY DH, 1989, PUBLIC PRODUCTIVITY, V12, P237
[8]  
Danziger J. N., 2002, INT J PUBLIC ADMIN, V25, P591, DOI DOI 10.1081/PAD-120003292
[9]   Innovation in innovation? The technology enactment framework [J].
Danziger, JN .
SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2004, 22 (01) :100-110