Terlipressin in the Treatment of Late Phase Catecholamine-Resistant Septic Shock

被引:27
作者
Svoboda, Petr [1 ]
Scheer, Peter [2 ,3 ]
Kantorova, Ilona [1 ]
Doubek, Jaroslav [2 ]
Dudra, Jan [4 ]
Radvan, Martin [5 ]
Radvanova, Jana [5 ]
机构
[1] Trauma Hosp Brno, Res Ctr Traumatol & Surg, Brno, Czech Republic
[2] Vet & Pharmaceut Univ Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
[3] ICCT Brno, St Annes Univ Hosp ICRC, Brno, Czech Republic
[4] Emergency Med Serv, Prague, Czech Republic
[5] Hosp Treb, Brno, Czech Republic
关键词
Terlipressin; Refractory septic shock; Norepinephrine; FACTOR PATHWAY INHIBITOR; SEVERE SEPSIS; VASOPRESSIN DEFICIENCY; ORGAN DYSFUNCTION; NOREPINEPHRINE; INFUSION; MULTICENTER; EPIDEMIOLOGY; DOPAMINE; FAILURE;
D O I
10.5754/hge10550
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Aims: Norepinephrine, but also dopamine and epinephrine are recommended as first line vasopressors in the treatment of septic shock. In some patients, septic shock deteriorates and becomes to be resistant to catecholamines. In this situation, addition of vasopressin or terlipressin can be advantageous. The aim of our pilot study was to evaluate the impact of terlipressin on open label norepinephrine requirements and mortality. Methodology: In a randomized, controlled, single centre study we assigned patients with late advanced septic shock refractory to catecholamines (norepinephrine >0.6 mu g/kg/min for more than 24h) to receive either continuously terlipressin 4mg/24h for 72 hours in addition to open label norepinephrine (TERLI group) or to continue therapy only with catecholamines (CON group). All vasopressor infusions were titrated to maintain a target blood pressure. Results: We enrolled 30 patients, of whom 13 were assigned to terlipressin and in 17 we continued in catecholamine therapy. There was no significant difference in norepinephrine consumption between the groups. Open label norepinephrine infusion rates decreased significantly in the TERLI group as compared with initial consumption, but the decrease we observed only in 7 (54%) patients. There was no significant difference between groups in the rate of death at day 28 (77% in TERLI group and 94% in CON group; p=0.18) or at day 90 (91% vs. 94%; p=0.85). Conclusions: Continuous terlipressin infusion was not effective in reducing norepinephrine consumption or in the mortality of patients, if administered in late phase of catecholamine refractory septic shock.
引用
收藏
页码:1043 / 1047
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Assessment of the safety of recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor in patients with severe sepsis: A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind, dose escalation study
    Abraham, E
    Reinhart, K
    Svoboda, P
    Seibert, A
    Olthoff, D
    Dal Nogare, A
    Postier, R
    Hempelmann, G
    Butler, T
    Martin, E
    Zwingelstein, C
    Percell, S
    Shu, V
    Leighton, A
    Creasey, AA
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (11) : 2081 - 2089
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of tifacogin (recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor) in severe sepsis -: A randomized controlled trial
    Abraham, E
    Reinhart, K
    Opal, S
    Demeyer, I
    Doig, C
    Rodriguez, AL
    Beale, R
    Svoboda, P
    Laterre, PF
    Simon, S
    Light, B
    Spapen, H
    Stone, J
    Seibert, A
    Peckelsen, C
    De Deyne, C
    Postier, R
    Pettilä, V
    Sprung, CL
    Artigas, A
    Percell, SR
    Shu, V
    Zwingelstein, C
    Tobias, J
    Poole, L
    Stolzenbach, JC
    Creasey, AA
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (02): : 238 - 247
  • [3] Terlipressin or norepinephrine in hyperdynamic septic shock:: A prospective, randomized study
    Albanese, Jacques
    Leone, Marc
    Delmas, Anne
    Martin, Claude
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (09) : 1897 - 1902
  • [4] Epidemiology of sepsis and infection in ICU patients from an international multicentre cohort study
    Alberti, C
    Brun-Buisson, C
    Burchardi, H
    Martin, C
    Goodman, S
    Artigas, A
    Sicignano, A
    Palazzo, M
    Moreno, R
    Boulmé, R
    Lepage, E
    Le Gall, JR
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2002, 28 (02) : 108 - 121
  • [5] Current epidemiology of septic shock - The CUB-Rea network
    Annane, D
    Aegerter, P
    Jars-Guincestre, MC
    Guidet, B
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 168 (02) : 165 - 172
  • [6] Incidence, organ dysfunction and mortality in severe sepsis: a Spanish multicentre study
    Blanco, Jesus
    Muriel-Bombin, Arturo
    Sagredo, Victor
    Taboada, Francisco
    Gandia, Francisco
    Tamayo, Luis
    Collado, Javier
    Garcia-Labattut, Angel
    Carriedo, Demetrio
    Valledor, Manuel
    De Frutos, Martin
    Lopez, Maria-Jesus
    Caballero, Ana
    Guerra, Jose
    Alvarez, Braulio
    Mayo, Agustin
    Villar, Jesus
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2008, 12 (06)
  • [7] Comparison of Dopamine and Norepinephrine in the Treatment of Shock.
    De Backer, Daniel
    Biston, Patrick
    Devriendt, Jacques
    Madl, Christian
    Chochrad, Didier
    Aldecoa, Cesar
    Brasseur, Alexandre
    Defrance, Pierre
    Gottignies, Philippe
    Vincent, Jean-Louis
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (09) : 779 - 789
  • [8] Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008
    Dellinger, R. Phillip
    Levy, Mitchell M.
    Carlet, Jean M.
    Bion, Julian
    Parker, Margaret M.
    Jaeschke, Roman
    Reinhart, Konrad
    Angus, Derek C.
    Brun-Buisson, Christian
    Beale, Richard
    Calandra, Thierty
    Dhainaut, Jean-Francois
    Gerlach, Herwig
    Harvey, Maurene
    Marini, John J.
    Marshall, John
    Ranieri, Marco
    Ramsay, Graham
    Sevransky, Jonathan
    Thompson, B. Taylor
    Townsend, Sean
    Vender, Jeffrey S.
    Zimmerman, Janice L.
    Vincent, Jean-Louis
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (01) : 296 - 327
  • [9] Landry DW, 1997, CIRCULATION, V95, P1122
  • [10] Mechanisms of disease: The pathogenesis of vasodilatory shock
    Landry, DW
    Oliver, JA
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (08) : 588 - 595