The value and limitations of rechallenge in the guinea pig maximization test

被引:17
作者
Frankild, S [1 ]
Basketter, DA [1 ]
Andersen, KE [1 ]
机构
[1] UNILEVER ENVIRONM SAFETY LAB,SHARNBROOK,BEDS,ENGLAND
关键词
rechallenge; guinea pig maximization test; GPMT; dose-response; false-positive; cross-sensitization; contact allergy;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02330.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The guinea pig maximization test (GPMT) has played a primary role in the evaluation of potential skin contact sensitizers for 25 years. In the OECD Guideline 406 from 1993, it is specifically suggested that equivocal results from the initial challenge in the GPMT should be evaluated further with a repeated challenge. However, there exist few published rechallenge data and the guideline does not describe how rechallenge data should be interpreted. In this paper, we have used examples from published results to illustrate both the positive value and the limitations of repeated challenges, including cross challenge. Testing with modified concentrations may also help to indicate whether or not the response is allergic in nature, particularly where there has been a low level of skin reaction observed in shamtreated controls, or where a low level of skin reaction is the dominant response in the test animals. In conclusion, the data presented demonstrate that, as a tool for the investigation of skin sensitizing potential, the GPMT can benefit from an experienced scientific evaluation of rechallenge data, but that this information should not be treated in a mechanistic fashion.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 140
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   SENSITIVITY AND SUBSEQUENT DOWN REGULATION OF SENSITIVITY INDUCED BY CHLOROCRESOL IN GUINEA-PIGS [J].
ANDERSEN, KE .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1985, 277 (02) :84-87
[2]   IS CYTOX-3522 (10-PERCENT METHYLENE-BIS-THIOCYANATE) A HUMAN-SKIN SENSITIZER [J].
ANDERSEN, KE ;
HAMANN, K .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1983, 9 (03) :186-189
[3]  
ANDERSEN KE, 1984, CONTACT DERMATITIS, V11, P11, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1984.tb00163.x
[4]   HOW TO DO SENSITIZATION TESTS IN GUINEA-PIGS [J].
ANDERSEN, KE ;
BRUZE, M ;
KARLBERG, AT ;
WAHLBERG, JE ;
VOLUND, A .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1994, 31 (04) :278-279
[5]  
ANDERSEN KE, 1996, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, V75, P463
[6]  
[Anonymous], DERMATOTOXICOLOGY
[7]   SEQUENTIAL IMMUNOPHENOTYPIC STUDY OF LYMPHOID INFILTRATE IN ALLERGIC AND IRRITANT REACTIONS [J].
AVNSTORP, C ;
RALFKIAER, E ;
JORGENSEN, J ;
WANTZIN, GL .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1987, 16 (05) :239-245
[8]  
BASKETTER DA, 1994, IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY IMM, P693
[9]   TRUE CROSS-SENSITIZATION, FALSE CROSS-SENSITIZATION AND OTHERWISE [J].
BENEZRA, C ;
MAIBACH, H .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1984, 11 (02) :65-69
[10]  
BJORKNER B, 1981, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, V61, P7