A collaborative approach to targeted treatment development for schizophrenia: A qualitative evaluation of the NIMH-MATRICS project

被引:15
作者
Bromley, E
机构
[1] Robert Wood Johnson Clin Scholars Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare Syst, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
schizophrenia; cognition; psychotropic drugs; therapeutic use; diffusion of innovation; qualitative research;
D O I
10.1093/schbul/sbi059
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Introduction: In 2002, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) initiated a multistakeholder research process designed to stimulate the development and evaluation of medications targeting the cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia. The first phase, Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS), sought consensus on laboratory measures for cognition, clinical trial outcome measures, and drug registration requirements. MATRICS constitutes a unique drug development model because it targeted a specific endophenotype of schizophrenia and because it engaged academic, industry, and government stakeholders in a consensus-oriented process. This study offers a preliminary qualitative evaluation of the NIMH-MATRICS project. Method: Interview data are used to describe how MATRICS participants regard 3 aspects of the development of cognitive medications: the definition of the treatment target, stakeholders' role in the early development process, and anticipated dissemination complexities. Results: MATRICS participants describe the treatment target in highly varied ways and envision a wide range of public health benefits. MATRICS is perceived as inclusive, despite minimal representation from some end users. According to informants, clinical detection, documentation, and monitoring of cognition and functioning may prove problematic. More thoroughly than non-industry-employed informants, industry-employed MATRICS participants articulate strategies by which treatments can be integrated into clinical practice. Discussion: The MATRICS process did not produce a clinical concept of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia, and significant challenges remain to be addressed regarding the rational clinical use of novel pharmaceuticals for cognition. Broader inclusion of end users in translational science projects may streamline implementation and facilitate improvements in real-world outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:954 / 961
页数:8
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, PROTECTING AM HLTH F
[2]  
Barbour RS, 2000, J EVAL CLIN PRACT, V6, P155
[3]   The impact of service characteristics on functional outcomes from community support programs for persons with schizophrenia: A growth curve analysis [J].
Brekke, JS ;
Long, JD ;
Nesbitt, N ;
Sobel, E .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 65 (03) :464-475
[4]   Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems [J].
Dixon-Woods, M ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Roberts, K .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2001, 7 (02) :125-133
[5]   Breaking the log-jam in treatment development for cognition in schizophrenia: NIMH perspective [J].
Fenton, WS ;
Stover, EL ;
Insel, TR .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 169 (3-4) :365-366
[6]   Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed "mindlines?" - Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care [J].
Gabbay, J ;
le May, A .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7473) :1013-1016A
[7]   Measurement and treatment research to improve cognition in schizophrenia: neuropharmacological aspects [J].
Geyer, MA ;
Tamminga, CA .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 174 (01) :1-2
[8]   Spatial working memory as an endophenotype for schizophrenia [J].
Glahn, DC ;
Therman, S ;
Manninen, M ;
Huttunen, M ;
Kaprio, J ;
Lönnqvist, J ;
Cannon, TD .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 53 (07) :624-626
[9]   Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to- effectiveness transition [J].
Glasgow, RE ;
Lichtenstein, E ;
Marcus, AC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2003, 93 (08) :1261-1267
[10]   The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: Etymology and strategic intentions [J].
Gottesman, II ;
Gould, TD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 160 (04) :636-645