Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: A taxonomy for mammalian OAEs

被引:577
作者
Shera, CA [1 ]
Guinan, JJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirm, Eaton Peabody Lab Auditory Physiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.426948
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) of all types are widely assumed to arise by a common mechanism: nonlinear electromechanical distortion within the cochlea. In this view, both stimulus-frequency (SFOAEs) and distortion-product emissions (DPOAEs) arise because nonlinearities in the mechanics act as "sources" of backward-traveling waves. This unified picture is tested by analyzing measurements of emission phase using a simple phenomenological description of the nonlinear re-emission process. The analysis framework is independent of the detailed form of the emission sources and the nonlinearities that produce them. The analysis demonstrates that the common assumption that SFOAEs originate by nonlinear distortion requires that SFOAE phase be essentially independent of frequency, in striking contradiction with experiment. This contradiction implies that evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms within the cochlea. These two mechanisms (linear reflection versus nonlinear distortion) are described and two broad classes of emissions-reflection-source and distortion-source emissions-are distinguished based on the mechanisms of their generation. The implications of this OAE taxonomy for the measurement, interpretation, and clinical use of otoacoustic emissions as noninvasive probes of cochlear function are discussed. (C) 1999 Acoustical Society of America. [S0001-4966(99)02202-X].
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 798
页数:17
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]   A 2ND COCHLEAR-FREQUENCY MAP THAT CORRELATES DISTORTION-PRODUCT AND NEURAL TUNING MEASUREMENTS [J].
ALLEN, JB ;
FAHEY, PF .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1993, 94 (02) :809-816
[2]   MICROMECHANICAL MODELS OF THE COCHLEA [J].
ALLEN, JB ;
NEELY, ST .
PHYSICS TODAY, 1992, 45 (07) :40-47
[3]   OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS [J].
ALLEN, JB ;
LONSBURYMARTIN, BL .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1993, 93 (01) :568-569
[4]  
[Anonymous], THESIS RIJKSUNIVERSI
[5]   SUPPRESSION OF STIMULUS FREQUENCY OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS [J].
BRASS, D ;
KEMP, DT .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1993, 93 (02) :920-939
[6]   TIME-DOMAIN OBSERVATION OF OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS DURING CONSTANT TONE STIMULATION [J].
BRASS, D ;
KEMP, DT .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1991, 90 (05) :2415-2427
[7]  
Bredberg G., 1968, Acta Otolaryngol, V236, P1
[8]  
Brillouin L., 1946, WAVE PROPAGATION PER
[9]   SUPPRESSIBILITY OF THE 2F1-F2 STIMULATED ACOUSTIC EMISSIONS IN GERBIL AND MAN [J].
BROWN, AM ;
KEMP, DT .
HEARING RESEARCH, 1984, 13 (01) :29-37
[10]   Two sources of acoustic distortion products from the human cochlea [J].
Brown, AM ;
Harris, FP ;
Beveridge, HA .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1996, 100 (05) :3260-3267