Applications of the crown diameter-stem diameter relationship for different species of broadleaved trees

被引:129
作者
Hemery, GE [1 ]
Savill, PS
Pryor, SN
机构
[1] Northmoor Trust, Little Wittenham OX14 4RA, Oxon, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Plant Sci, Oxford Forestry Inst, Oxford OX1 3RB, England
[3] Forestry Commiss, Cambridge CB1 2DU, England
关键词
crown diameter; stem diameter; K/d relationship; broadleaved trees; thinning regimes; tree spacing;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.016
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
There is a well known but comparatively little-studied relationship between crown diameters (K) and stem diameters (d) of trees. Between about 20 and 50 cm dbh the relationship is very close to being linear, with an r(2) value higher than 0.8. The investigation described in this paper was conducted to establish the relationships for 11 broadleaved species that are commonly grown in Britain. The results indicated that all species have higher Kld ratios when they are young, but the ratio reduces as stem diameter increases, beginning to stabilize around 30 cm dbh. Of the species investigated, walnut (Juglans regia) had by far the highest ratio when young, but other strongly light-demanding species, such as birch (Betula pendula), had very low ratios. There was no strong suggestion that the Kld ratio could be used to predict the tolerance of species, with high ratios for the more shade tolerant species, as indicated by Shallenberger et al. (1986). The possible applications and uses of a knowledge of the Kld ratio are discussed, including implications for decisions on spacings, basal areas per hectare, the prediction of desirable stocking levels for any given mean stem diameter, and thinning regimes. Also discussed, are spacings that might be appropriate in mixed species stands, the management of overstories in shelterwood systems, genetic selection in breeding programmes and prediction of volumes of branchwood for fuel. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 294
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, YIELD MODELS FOREST
[2]  
[Anonymous], ARBOR
[3]  
BRIEGLEB PHILIP A., 1952, JOUR FOREST, V50, P529
[4]  
CLARK FB, 1967, J FOREST, V65, P716
[5]  
Colette L., 1951, Bulletin de la Societe Royale Forestiere de Belgique, V58, P415
[6]   THE ESTIMATION OF THE BRANCHWOOD COMPONENT OF BROADLEAVED WOODLANDS [J].
CORBYN, IN ;
CROCKFORD, KJ ;
SAVILL, PS .
FORESTRY, 1988, 61 (03) :193-204
[7]  
Curtin R. A., 1964, Australian Forestry, V28, P91
[8]  
Dawkins H. C., 1963, Commonwealth Forestry Review, V42, P318
[9]  
Duchaufour A, 1903, REV EAUX FOR, V42, P65
[10]  
Gering Lawrence R., 1995, Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, V19, P177