Effects of lead on learning in herring gulls: An avian wildlife model for neurobehavioral deficits

被引:52
作者
Burger, J
Gochfeld, M
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Div Life Sci, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] UMDNJ, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Consortium Risk Evaluat Stakeholder Participat, Environm & Occupat Hlth Sci Inst, Piscataway, NJ USA
[3] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, CRESP, EOHSI, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
关键词
learning; lead; cognitive development; developmental exposure; behavior; herring gulls; individual recognition; wildlife bioindicators;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuro.2005.01.005
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 [神经生物学];
摘要
Lead is one of the most common metals in contaminated ecosystems. Although lead poisoning and mortality have long been known, little is known of the neurobehavioral effects produced by low levels of lead in wild animals. Herein we describe the neurobehavioral effects of lead on learning using herring gulls (Larus argentatus) as a model. Doses used in these studies conducted in the laboratory and in nature were sufficient to produce lead concentrations in feathers that were equivalent to those found in gulls living in the wild. The exposure consisted of a single intraperitoneal injection of 0 and 100 mg/kg lead acetate on day 2; each experiment involved 20-30 chicks in a lead-exposed group, and 20-30 chicks in a control group. We examined walking, begging, feeding, behavioral thermoregulation, individual recognition, and treadmill learning. There were significant differences between control and lead-exposed gulls chicks on all testing days. Learning, as well as improvement of motor skills, was faster for control chicks than lead-injected chicks for the thermoregulatory test, individual recognition, and behavioral on a treadmill. Lead-injected chicks improved faster than control chicks only for walking scores. In a test where chicks were shown food under a cup, and then tested with three overturned cups, lead-exposed chicks did not show much improvement, whereas control chicks quickly learned where the food was located. The greatest differences in improvement were on the behavioral thermo regulation test, where lead-exposed chicks showed no improvement with age. Overall, this series of experiments indicated that for tasks involving learning, the disparity in accuracy and ability remained regardless of the number of days since exposure-control chicks sometimes improved and learned quicker than did lead-exposed chicks. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 624
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]
OPERANT-BEHAVIOR OF RATS EXPOSED TO LEAD BEFORE OR AFTER WEANING [J].
ANGELL, NF ;
WEISS, B .
TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 1982, 63 (01) :62-71
[2]
[Anonymous], HDB ECOTOXICOLOGY
[3]
[Anonymous], 1991, Federal Register, V56, P26460
[4]
*ATSDR, 1988, NAT EXT LEAD POIS CH
[5]
*ATSDR, 1999, TOX PROF LEAD
[6]
*ATSDR, 2004, TOP 20 HAZ SUBST 200
[7]
LAUGHING GULL CHICKS - RECOGNITION OF THEIR PARENTS VOICES [J].
BEER, CG .
SCIENCE, 1969, 166 (3908) :1030-&
[8]
LONGITUDINAL ANALYSES OF PRENATAL AND POSTNATAL LEAD-EXPOSURE AND EARLY COGNITIVE-DEVELOPMENT [J].
BELLINGER, D ;
LEVITON, A ;
WATERNAUX, C ;
NEEDLEMAN, H ;
RABINOWITZ, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1987, 316 (17) :1037-1043
[9]
Lead, attention, and impulsive behavior: Changes in a fixed-ratio waiting-for-reward paradigm [J].
Brockel, BJ ;
Cory-Slechta, DA .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1998, 60 (02) :545-552
[10]
Gender differences in developmental immunotoxicity to lead in the chicken: Analysis following a single early low-level exposure in ovo [J].
Bunn, TL ;
Marsh, JA ;
Dietert, RR .
JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART A-CURRENT ISSUES, 2000, 61 (08) :677-693