Factors affecting the distribution of neural blockade by local anesthetics in epidural anesthesia and a comparison of lumbar versus thoracic epidural anesthesia

被引:84
作者
Visser, W. Anton [1 ]
Lee, Ruben A. [2 ]
Gielen, Mathieu J. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Amphia Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Intens Care & Pain Management, NL-4800 RL Breda, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Mech Maritime & Mat Engn, Dept Biomech Engn, Delft, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Nijmegen, Dept Anesthesiol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1213/ane.0b013e31817e7065
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 [麻醉学];
摘要
The spread of sensory blockade after epidural injection of a specific dose of local anesthetic (LA) differs considerably among individuals, and the factors affecting this distribution remain the subject of debate. Based on the results of recent investigations regarding the distribution of epidural neural blockade, specifically for thoracic epidural anesthesia, we noted that the total mass of LA appears to be the most important factor in determining the extent of sensory, sympathetic, and motor neural blockade, whereas the site of epidural needle/catheter placement governs the pattern of distribution of blockade relative to the injection site. Age may be positively correlated with the spread of sensory blockade, and the evidence is somewhat stronger for thoracic than for lumbar epidural anesthesia. Other patient characteristics and technical details, such as patient position, and mode and speed of injection, exert only a small effect on the distribution of sensory blockade, or their effects are equivocal. However, combinations of several patient and technical factors may aid in predicting LA dose requirements. Based on these results, we have also formulated suggested epidural insertion sites that may optimize both analgesia and sympathicolysis for various surgical indications.
引用
收藏
页码:708 / 721
页数:14
相关论文
共 164 条
[1]
An epidural scoring scale for arm movements (ESSAM) in patients receiving high thoracic epidural analgesia for coronary artery bypass grafting [J].
Abd Elrazek, E ;
Scott, NB ;
Vohra, A .
ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (11) :1104-1109
[2]
DOSE-RESPONSE STUDIES IN ELDERLY PATIENTS SUBJECTED TO EPIDURAL ANALGESIA [J].
ANDERSEN, S ;
COLD, GE .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1981, 25 (03) :279-281
[3]
APOSTOLOU GA, 1981, ANESTH ANALG, V60, P584
[4]
Does pregnancy increase the efficacy of lumbar epidural anesthesia? [J].
Arakawa, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2004, 13 (02) :86-90
[5]
Block of the sacral segments in lumbar epidural anaesthesia [J].
Arakawa, M ;
Aoyama, Y ;
Ohe, Y .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 90 (02) :173-178
[6]
Epidural bolus injection with alkalinized lidocaine improves blockade of the first sacral segment - a brief report [J].
Arakawa, M ;
Aoyama, Y ;
Ohe, Y .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2002, 49 (06) :566-570
[7]
Decreased incidence of complications in parturients with the Arrow (FlexTip Plus™) epidural catheter [J].
Banwell, BR ;
Morley-Forster, P ;
Krause, R .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1998, 45 (04) :370-372
[8]
FOREARM VASCULAR TONE AND REACTIVITY DURING LUMBAR EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA [J].
BARON, JF ;
PAYEN, D ;
CORIAT, P ;
EDOUARD, A ;
VIARS, P .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1988, 67 (11) :1065-1070
[9]
Epidural anesthesia for coronary artery bypass surgery compared with general anesthesia alone does not reduce biochemical markers of myocardial damage [J].
Barrington, MJ ;
Kluger, R ;
Watson, R ;
Scott, DA ;
Harris, KJ .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 100 (04) :921-928
[10]
BEILIN Y, 1995, ANESTH ANALG, V81, P301