Zeta potential of commercial RO membranes: influence of source water type and chemistry

被引:73
作者
Deshmukh, SS
Childress, AE
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Dept Civil Engn, Reno, NV 89557 USA
[2] Orange Cty Water Dist, Fountain Valley, CA 92728 USA
关键词
zeta potential; streaming potential; membrane charge; reverse osmosis membrane;
D O I
10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00357-5
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Streaming potential measurements have typically been performed on reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF) membranes using simple solution chemistries that are representative of those found in natural waters and wastewaters. In this investigation, streaming potential measurements were performed on RO membranes using actual membrane feed waters. Tertiary wastewater effluents which serves as membrane feedwater at the Orange County Water District (Fountain Valley, California) and river water from the Brazos River (Brazos, Texas) were used. Additionally, the effects of glutaraldehyde (a membrane storage agent) and atrazine (a pesticide) on membrane surface charge were evaluated. The pesticide was evaluated in the presence and absence of humic acid. Results showed a more positive zeta potential in the presence of the Brazos River water, most likely due to the presence of divalent cations (Ca2+ and Mg2+). For the tertiary wastewater effluent, adsorption of organic acids in the wastewater effluent may have been the cause of the more negative zeta potential in,the low pH range and the presence of divalent cations may have been the cause of the more positive zeta potential in the high pH range. The glutaraldehyde and atrazine showed little effect on the surface charge of the membranes. However, atrazine in the presence of humic acid showed a significant effect on the zeta potential, causing the membrane to have a less negative surface charge than in the presence of the humic acid alone.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 95
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Electrokinetic characterization of composite membranes: estimation of different electrical contributions in pressure induced potential measured across reverse osmosis membranes [J].
Benavente, J ;
Jonsson, G .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2000, 172 (1-2) :189-197
[2]   Electrokinetic investigations of charged porous membranes [J].
Blank, R ;
Muth, KH ;
Proske-Gerhards, S ;
Staude, E .
COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 1998, 140 (1-3) :3-11
[3]   STUDY OF STREAMING POTENTIALS OF CLEAN AND FOULED ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES [J].
CAUSSERAND, C ;
NYSTROM, M ;
AIMAR, P .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1994, 88 (2-3) :211-222
[4]   Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics [J].
Childress, AE ;
Elimelech, M .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (17) :3710-3716
[5]   Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes [J].
Childress, AE ;
Elimelech, M .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1996, 119 (02) :253-268
[6]  
CHILDRESS AE, 1997, THESIS U CALIFORNIA
[7]   Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes [J].
Elimelech, M ;
Zhu, XH ;
Childress, AE ;
Hong, SK .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1997, 127 (01) :101-109
[8]   Zeta-potential and rejection rates of a polyethersulfone nanofiltration membrane in single salt solutions [J].
Ernst, M ;
Bismarck, A ;
Springer, J ;
Jekel, M .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2000, 165 (02) :251-259
[9]   Studies in electro-endosmosis Part I [J].
Fairbrother, F ;
Mastin, H .
JOURNAL OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1924, 125 :2319-2330
[10]   Modelling the rejection of nanofiltration membranes using zeta potential measurements [J].
Hagmeyer, G ;
Gimbel, R .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 15 (01) :19-30