A NEW DETERMINING METHOD FOR THE CRITERIA WEIGHTS IN MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION

被引:122
作者
Ginevicius, Romualdas [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Enterprise Econ & Business Management Dept, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
Multicriteria evaluation methods; methods of determining the criteria weights; FARE method; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; CONTRACTOR SELECTION; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY; SOCIAL-DEVELOPMENT; AHP; CONSTRUCTION; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; BANKS; RATIO;
D O I
10.1142/S0219622011004713
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The accuracy of the results obtained by using multicriteria evaluation methods largely depends on the determination of the criteria weights. The accuracy of expert evaluation decreases with the increase of the number of criteria. The application of the analytic hierarchy process, based on pairwise comparison of the criteria, or similar methods, may help to solve this problem. However, if the number of the pairs of criteria is large, the same problems, associated with the accuracy of evaluation, arise. In the present paper, a new method of determining the criteria weights, FARE (Factor Relationship), based on the relationships between all the criteria describing the phenomenon considered, is offered. It means that, at the first stage, a minimal amount of the initial data about the relationships between a part of the set of criteria, as well as their strength and direction, is elicited from experts. Then, based on the conditions of functioning and the specific features of the complete set of criteria, the relations between other criteria of the set and their direction are determined analytically in compliance with those established at the first stage. When the total impact of each particular criterion on other criteria of the set or its total dependence on other criteria of a particular set is known, the criteria weights can be determined.
引用
收藏
页码:1067 / 1095
页数:29
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   USING THE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS IN SELECTING COMMERCIAL REAL-TIME OPERATING SYSTEMS [J].
Ahmad, Norita ;
Laplante, Phillip A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2009, 8 (01) :151-168
[2]   DETERMINING AGGREGATE CRITERIA WEIGHTS FROM CRITERIA RANKINGS BY A GROUP OF DECISION MAKERS [J].
Alfares, Hesham K. ;
Duffuaa, Salih O. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2008, 7 (04) :769-781
[3]   A weighted additive fuzzy multiobjective model for the supplier selection problem under price breaks in a supply Chain [J].
Amid, Amin ;
Ghodsypour, S. H. ;
O'Brien, Christopher .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2009, 121 (02) :323-332
[4]   ROBUSTNESS OF THE MULTI-OBJECTIVE MOORA METHOD WITH A TEST FOR THE FACILITIES SECTOR [J].
Brauers, Willem K. ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas K. .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2009, 15 (02) :352-375
[5]   ANALYSIS OF THE ALIGNMENT OF COMPANY GOALS TO WEB CONTENT USING ANP [J].
Caballero-Luque, Antonio ;
Aragones-Beltran, Pablo ;
Garcia-Melon, Monica ;
Dema-Perez, Carlos .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2010, 9 (03) :419-436
[6]   Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation [J].
Chen, Y. ;
Yu, J. ;
Khan, S. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2010, 25 (12) :1582-1591
[7]   TO RETIRE OR EXPAND? A FUZZY GIS-BASED SPATIAL MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE [J].
Chen, Yun ;
Khan, Shahbaz ;
Paydar, Zahra .
IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2010, 59 (02) :174-188
[8]   A min-max goal programming approach to priority derivation in AHP with interval judgements [J].
Despotis, Dimitris K. ;
Derpanis, Dimitris .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2008, 7 (01) :175-182
[9]  
Ergu D., 2011, J SUPERCOMPUT, P1
[10]  
Ergu D., 2011, COMPUTERS OPERATIONS