Global Risk Classification and Clinical SYNTAX (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) Score in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous or Surgical Left Main Revascularization

被引：120

作者：

Capodanno, Davide ^{[1
,2
]}

Caggegi, Anna ^{[2
]}

Miano, Marco ^{[2
]}

Cincotta, Glauco ^{[2
]}

Dipasqua, Fabio ^{[2
]}

Giacchi, Giuseppe ^{[2
]}

Capranzano, Piera ^{[1
,2
]}

Ussia, Gianpaolo ^{[2
]}

Di Salvo, Maria Elena ^{[2
]}

La Manna, Alessio ^{[2
]}

Tamburino, Corrado ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] ETNA Fdn, Catania, Italy

[2] Ferrarotto Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc, Catania, Italy

来源：

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS | 2011年 / 4卷 / 03期

关键词：

coronary artery bypass graft (CABG); percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); revascularization; risk score; ARTERY-BYPASS GRAFT; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; DISEASE; STRATIFICATION; PREDICTION; EUROSCORE; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; PCI;

D O I：

10.1016/j.jcin.2010.10.013

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the ability to predict cardiac mortality of the Global Risk Classification (GRC) and the Clinical SYNTAX (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) score (CSS) in left main (LM) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Background There is a renewed interest in combining clinical and angiographic information to define the risk of patients undergoing LM revascularization. Methods The GRC and CSS were assessed in patients undergoing LM PCI (n = 400) or CABG (n = 549). Stand-alone clinical (ACEF [age, creatinine, ejection fraction]), EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) and angiographic (SYNTAX score) risk scores were also investigated. Results The GRC (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic 0.357, p = 0.550; area under the curve 0.743) and the ACEF (Hosmer-Lemeshow 0.426, p = 0.514; area under the curve 0.741) showed the most balanced predictive characteristics in the PCI and CABG cohorts, respectively. In PCI patients, the CSS used fewer data to achieve similar discrimination but poorer calibration than the GRC. Propensity-adjusted outcomes were comparable between PCI and CABG patients with low, intermediate, or high EuroSCORE, ACEF, GRC, and CSS and those with low or intermediate SYNTAX score. Conversely, in the group with the highest SYNTAX score, the risk of cardiac mortality was significantly higher in PCI patients (hazard ratio: 2.323, 95% confidence interval: 1.091 to 4.945, p = 0.029). Conclusions In LM patients undergoing PCI, combined scores improve the discrimination accuracy of clinical or angiographic stand-alone tools. In LM patients undergoing CABG, the ACEF score has the best prognostic accuracy compared with other stand-alone or combined scores. The good predictive ability for PCI along with the poor predictive ability for CABG make the SYNTAX score the preferable decision-making tool in LM disease. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2011;4:287-97) (C) 2011 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

引用

页码：287 / 297

页数：11

共 22 条

[1]

Altman DG, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P453, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000229)19:4<453::AID-SIM350>3.3.CO

[2]

2-X

[3]

Brito J, 2010, EUROINTERVENTION, V6, pH69

[4] Early and late outcome of myocardial revascularization with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in high risk patients (EuroSCORE ≥ 6) [J].