The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain

被引:169
作者
Blakemore, SJ
Boyer, P
Pachot-Clouard, M
Meltzoff, A
Segebarth, C
Decety, J
机构
[1] INSERM, U280, F-69008 Lyon, France
[2] Washington Univ, Coll Arts & Sci, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[3] CEA, LRC, Unite Mixte INSERM UJF U594, Grenoble, France
[4] Univ Washington, Ctr Mind Brain & Learning, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/cercor/13.8.837
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Contingencies between objects and people can be mechanical or intentional-social in nature. In this fMRI study we used simplified stimuli to investigate brain regions involved in the detection of mechanical and intentional contingencies. Using a factorial design we manipulated the 'animacy' and 'contingency' of stimulus movement, and the subject's attention to the contingencies. The detection of mechanical contingency between shapes whose movement was inanimate engaged the middle temporal gyrus and right intraparietal sulcus. The detection of intentional contingency between shapes whose movement was animate activated superior parietal networks bilaterally. These activations were unaffected by attention to contingency. Additional regions, the right middle frontal gyrus and left superior temporal sulcus, became activated by the animate-contingent stimuli when subjects specifically attended to the contingent nature of the stimuli. Our results help to clarify neural networks previously associated with 'theory of mind' and agency detection. In particular, the results suggest that low-level perception of agency in terms of objects reacting to other objects at a distance is processed by parietal networks. In contrast, the activation of brain regions traditionally associated with theory of mind tasks appears to require attention to be directed towards agency and contingency.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 844
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region
    Allison, T
    Puce, A
    McCarthy, G
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (07) : 267 - 278
  • [2] DOES THE AUTISTIC-CHILD HAVE A THEORY OF MIND
    BARONCOHEN, S
    LESLIE, AM
    FRITH, U
    [J]. COGNITION, 1985, 21 (01) : 37 - 46
  • [3] From the perception of action to the understanding of intention
    Blakemore, SJ
    Decety, J
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 2 (08) : 561 - 567
  • [4] How the brain perceives causality: an event-related fMRI study
    Blakemore, SJ
    Fonlupt, P
    Pachot-Clouard, M
    Darmon, C
    Boyer, P
    Meltzoff, AN
    Segebarth, C
    Decety, J
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 2001, 12 (17) : 3741 - 3746
  • [5] A PET investigation of the attribution of intentions with a nonverbal task
    Brunet, E
    Sarfati, Y
    Hardy-Baylé, MC
    Decety, J
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 11 (02) : 157 - 166
  • [6] Movement and mind:: A functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns
    Castelli, F
    Happé, F
    Frith, U
    Frith, C
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 12 (03) : 314 - 325
  • [7] SUPERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX ACTIVATION DURING SPATIAL ATTENTION SHIFTS AND VISUAL FEATURE CONJUNCTION
    CORBETTA, M
    SHULMAN, GL
    MIEZIN, FM
    PETERSEN, SE
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1995, 270 (5237) : 802 - 805
  • [8] CORBETTA M, 1993, J NEUROSCI, V13, P1202
  • [9] Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets
    Culham, JC
    Brandt, SA
    Cavanagh, P
    Kanwisher, NG
    Dale, AM
    Tootell, RBH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 80 (05) : 2657 - 2670
  • [10] Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees?
    Fink, GR
    Halligan, PW
    Marshall, JC
    Frith, CD
    Frackowiak, RSJ
    Dolan, RJ
    [J]. NATURE, 1996, 382 (6592) : 626 - 628