Detection of cervical cancer and its precursors by endocervical curettage in 13,115 colposcopically guided biopsy examinations

被引:72
作者
Gage, Julia C. [1 ]
Duggan, Maire A. [2 ]
Nation, Jill G. [3 ]
Gao, Song [4 ]
Castle, Philip E. [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, NIH, Rockville, MD 20892 USA
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Alberta Canc Board, Alberta Cerv Canc Screening Program, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; colposcopy; curettage; diagnosis; endocervical sampling; ATYPICAL SQUAMOUS-CELLS; INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; WOMEN; MANAGEMENT; CYTOLOGY; HISTORY; LESION; DEBATE; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.048
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Endocervical curettage (ECC) specimens obtained during colposcopy can detect cervical cancer and precursors otherwise missed by biopsy alone, but the procedure can be painful and reduce compliance with needed follow-up. ECC is routinely performed in the Calgary Health Region colposcopy clinics, permitting a look at its real-world utility. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed pathology and colposcopy reports from 2003 to 2007. We calculated the added diagnostic utility of ECC compared with cervical biopsy alone. RESULTS: ECC increased the diagnostic yield of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN]2+) in 1.01% of 13,115 colposcopically guided biopsy examinations. Therefore, 99 ECC specimens were taken to detect 1 additional CIN2+. ECC detected 5.4% of 2443 CIN2+ subjects otherwise missed by biopsy alone. Utility was greatest among women aged 46 years or older referred after a high-grade cytology. CONCLUSION: ECC is rarely informative when used routinely in colposcopic practice. Older women referred after high-risk cytology benefit most from ECC.
引用
收藏
页码:481.e1 / 481.e9
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Endocervical curettage at the time of colposcopic assessment of the uterine cervix [J].
Abu, J ;
Davies, Q .
OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2005, 60 (05) :315-320
[2]  
Agpar BS, 2008, COLPOSCOPY PRINCIPLE, P115
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Obstet Gynecol, V112, P1419, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318192497c
[4]   Atypical Squamous Cells-Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (ASC-H): A Result Not to Be Ignored [J].
Barreth, Drew ;
Schepansky, Alexandra ;
Capstick, Valerie ;
Johnson, Gordon ;
Steed, Helen ;
Faught, Wylam .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2006, 28 (12) :1095-1098
[5]   Relationship of Atypical Glandular Cell Cytology, Age, and Human Papillomavirus Detection to Cervical and Endometrial Cancer Risks [J].
Castle, Philip E. ;
Fetterman, Barbara ;
Poitras, Nancy ;
Lorey, Thomas ;
Shaber, Ruth ;
Kinney, Walter .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 115 (02) :243-248
[6]   Evidence for Frequent Regression of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia-Grade 2 [J].
Castle, Philip E. ;
Schiffinan, Mark ;
Eeler, Cosette M. ;
Solomon, Diane .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 113 (01) :18-25
[7]   To ECC or Not to ECC: The Question Remains [J].
Driggers, Rita W. ;
Zahn, Christopher M. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 35 (04) :583-+
[8]  
DRIGGERS RW, 2008, OBSTET GYN CLIN N AM, V35, pR8
[9]   ENDOCERVICAL CURETTAGE HAS NO PLACE IN THE ROUTINE MANAGEMENT OF WOMEN WITH CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA - DEBATE [J].
FERENCZY, A .
CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 38 (03) :644-648
[10]   Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy [J].
Gage, Julia C. ;
Hanson, Vivien W. ;
Abbey, Kim ;
Dippery, Susan ;
Gardner, Susi ;
Kubota, Janet ;
Schiffman, Mark ;
Solomon, Diane ;
Jeronimo, Jose .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 108 (02) :264-272