Elective or selective caesarean delivery of the small baby? A systematic review of the controlled trials

被引:35
作者
Grant, A [1 ]
Penn, ZJ [1 ]
Steer, PJ [1 ]
机构
[1] CHELSEA & WESTMINSTER HOSP, CHARING CROSS & WESTMINSTER MED SCH, ACAD UNIT OBSTET & GYNAECOL, LONDON, ENGLAND
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY | 1996年 / 103卷 / 12期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09628.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To compare a policy of elective caesarean delivery with a policy of selective caesarean delivery for women in spontaneous preterm labour. Design Systematic review of relevant randomised controlled trials. Participants One hundred and twenty-two women from six trials. Interventions Random allocation to 'intention to deliver by caesarean section' (elective caesarean policy), compared with 'intention to deliver vaginally' (selective caesarean policy). Main outcome measures Actual use of caesarean delivery, low Apgar score, neonatal intubation, intracranial pathology, perinatal death, and major maternal complications. Results One in six women in both groups were not delivered as allocated. Typical odds ratios for all adverse neonatal outcomes tended to favour the elective group, but for all outcomes studied the confidence intervals were wide and did not exclude clinically important hazards of the policy. The odds of serious maternal morbidity were increased in the caesarean section group (OR 6.2; 95% CI 1.3-30.1). Conclusion A policy of elective caesarean delivery increases the risks of maternal morbidity, but it remains unclear whether these are offset by benefits for the infant.
引用
收藏
页码:1197 / 1200
页数:4
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Chalmers I, 1989, EFFECTIVE CARE PREGN, P39
[2]  
GRANT AM, 1993, PREGNANCY CHILDBIRTH
[3]   A FAILED RCT TO DETERMINE THE BEST METHOD OF DELIVERY FOR VERY LOW BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS [J].
LUMLEY, J ;
LESTER, A ;
RENOU, P ;
WOOD, C .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1985, 6 (02) :120-127
[4]   A multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing elective and selective caesarean section for the delivery of the preterm breech infant [J].
Penn, ZJ ;
Steer, PJ ;
Grant, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1996, 103 (07) :684-689
[5]  
Viegas O A, 1985, Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol, V11, P349
[6]  
WALLACE RL, 1984, J REPROD MED, V29, P736
[7]   THE IOWA PREMATURE BREECH TRIAL [J].
ZLATNIK, FJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1993, 10 (01) :60-63