Modeling plasma-based CO2 conversion: crucial role of the dissociation cross section

被引:118
作者
Bogaerts, Annemie [1 ]
Wang, Weizong [1 ]
Berthelot, Antonin [1 ]
Guerra, Vasco [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Dept Chem, Res Grp PLASMANT, Univ Pl 1, BE-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Univ Lisbon, Inst Super Tecn, Inst Plasmas & Fusao Nucl, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
plasma modeling; CO2; conversion; dissociation cross section; dielectric barrier discharge; microwave plasma; ELECTRON; MECHANISMS; EXCITATION; COLLISIONS;
D O I
10.1088/0963-0252/25/5/055016
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
Plasma-based CO2 conversion is gaining increasing interest worldwide. A large research effort is devoted to improving the energy efficiency. For this purpose, it is very important to understand the underlying mechanisms of the CO2 conversion. The latter can be obtained by computer modeling, describing in detail the behavior of the various plasma species and all relevant chemical processes. However, the accuracy of the modeling results critically depends on the accuracy of the assumed input data, like cross sections. This is especially true for the cross section of electron impact dissociation, as the latter process is believed to proceed through electron impact excitation, but it is not clear from the literature which excitation channels effectively lead to dissociation. Therefore, the present paper discusses the effect of different electron impact dissociation cross sections reported in the literature on the calculated CO2 conversion, for a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) and a microwave (MW) plasma. Comparison is made to experimental data for the DBD case, to elucidate which cross section might be the most realistic. This comparison reveals that the cross sections proposed by Itikawa and by Polak and Slovetsky both seem to underestimate the CO2 conversion. The cross sections recommended by Phelps with thresholds of 7 eV and 10.5 eV yield a CO2 conversion only slightly lower than the experimental data, but the sum of both cross sections overestimates the values, indicating that these cross sections represent dissociation, but most probably also include other (pure excitation) channels. Our calculations indicate that the choice of the electron impact dissociation cross section is crucial for the DBD, where this process is the dominant mechanism for CO2 conversion. In the MW plasma, it is only significant at pressures up to 100 mbar, while it is of minor importance for higher pressures, when dissociation proceeds mainly through collisions of CO2 with heavy particles.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Carbon Dioxide Splitting in a Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma: A Combined Experimental and Computational Study [J].
Aerts, Robby ;
Somers, Wesley ;
Bogaerts, Annemie .
CHEMSUSCHEM, 2015, 8 (04) :702-716
[2]   Influence of Vibrational States on CO2 Splitting by Dielectric Barrier Discharges [J].
Aerts, Robby ;
Martens, Tom ;
Bogaerts, Annemie .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C, 2012, 116 (44) :23257-23273
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1983, SOV PHYS DOKL
[4]   Modeling of plasma-based CO2 conversion: lumping of the vibrational levels [J].
Berthelot, Antonin ;
Bogaerts, Annemie .
PLASMA SOURCES SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 25 (04)
[5]   Plasma-based conversion of CO2: current status and future challenges [J].
Bogaerts, Annemie ;
Kozak, Tomas ;
van Laer, Koen ;
Snoeckx, Ramses .
FARADAY DISCUSSIONS, 2015, 183 :217-232
[6]  
Bongers W A, 2015, P 22 INT S PLASM CHE
[7]   DISSOCIATION OF CARBON DIOXIDE IN POSITIVE COLUMN OF A GLOW DISCHARGE [J].
CORVIN, KK ;
CORRIGAN, SJ .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1969, 50 (06) :2570-&
[8]  
Cosby P C, 1993, ADA266464 WRIGHT PAT
[9]   Non-thermal atmospheric pressure discharges [J].
Fridman, A ;
Chirokov, A ;
Gutsol, A .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2005, 38 (02) :R1-R24
[10]  
Fridman A., 2008, PLASMA CHEM