Rofecoxib versus codeine/acetaminophen in postoperative dental pain: A double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active comparator-controlled clinical trial

被引:67
作者
Chang, DJ
Fricke, JR
Bird, SR
Bohidar, NR
Dobbins, TW
Geba, GP
机构
[1] Merck & Co Inc, W Point, PA 19486 USA
[2] Austin Oral Surg PPD Dev, Austin, TX USA
关键词
rofecoxib; cyclooxygenase-2; codeine; postoperative dental pain; oral surgery; analgesic;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-2918(01)80119-3
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: In recent studies of acute pain and primary dysmenorrhea, rofecoxib, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that selectively targets the cyclooxyoenase-2 enzyme, was found to be similar in efficacy to ibuprofen and naproxen sodium. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the analgesic efficacy of a single oral dose of rofecoxib 50 mg compared with the combination of codeine 60 mg/acetaminophen 600 mg in a model of postsurgical dental pain. Methods: In this double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled, parallel-group study, patients experiencing moderate or severe pain after the surgical extraction of greater than or equal to2 third molars, at least 1 of which was a mandibular impaction, were randomized to receive placebo, rofecoxib 50 mg, or codeine 60 mg/acetaminophen 600 mg. Patient evaluations of pain intensity, pain relief, and global assessments were recorded throughout the 24-hour period after dosing. The 2-stopwatch method was used to determine time to confirmed perceptible pain relief. The primary end point assessing overall analgesic effect was total pain relief over 6 hours (TOPAR6). Secondary end points were patient global assessment of response to therapy (PGART) at 6 hours, onset of analgesia, peak analgesic effect, and duration of analgesia. Results: A total of 393 patients were enrolled; 182 received rofecoxib, 180 received codeine/acetaminophen, and 31 received placebo. The overall analgesic effect of rofecoxib 50 mg was greater than that of codeine 60 mg/acetaminophen 600 mg for TOPAR6 (12.4 vs 7.0; P<0.001) and PGART at 6 hours (P<0.001). The onset of analgesic effect was similar for rofecoxib and codeine/acetaminophen. Peak analgesic effect as measured by peak pain relief scores during the first 6 hours was significantly greater in the rofecoxib group compared with the codeine/acetaminophen, group (P<0.001), as was the duration of analgesic effect measured by the time to rescue analgesia (9.6 hours vs 2.3 hours, P<0.001). Adverse events were reported in 33.0%, 46.1%, and 32.3% of patients treated with rofecoxib, codeine/acetaminophen, and placebo, respectively. The most common adverse events were nausea (6.0%, 25.0%, and 9.7%, respectively) and vomiting (3.8%, 18.3%, and 6.5%, respectively). Significantly more patients in the codeine/acetaminophen group than in the rofecoxib group experienced adverse events overall (P<0.050) and nausea in particular (P<0.001). Conclusion: In this study of moderate to severe postoperative dental pain, the analgesic efficacy of rofecoxib, 50 mg was greater than that of codeine/acetaminophen, with a lower incidence of adverse events and nausea.
引用
收藏
页码:1446 / 1455
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], ADV PAIN RES THERAPY
  • [2] Cannon GW, 2000, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V43, P978, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200005)43:5<978::AID-ANR4>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-0
  • [4] COOPER S A, 1991, Journal of Clinical Dentistry, V2, P70
  • [5] Cooper S A, 1988, J Clin Dent, V1, P31
  • [6] A randomized trial of the efficacy and tolerability of the COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib vs ibuprofen in patients with osteoarthritis
    Day, R
    Morrison, B
    Luza, A
    Castaneda, O
    Strusberg, A
    Nahir, M
    Helgetveit, KB
    Kress, B
    Daniels, B
    Bolognese, J
    Krupa, D
    Seidenberg, B
    Ehrich, E
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 160 (12) : 1781 - 1787
  • [7] Desjardins P. J., 1996, Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, V59, P130, DOI 10.1038/sj.clpt.1996.21
  • [8] ANALGESIC EFFICACY OF FLURBIPROFEN IN COMPARISON WITH ACETAMINOPHEN, ACETAMINOPHEN PLUS CODEINE, AND PLACEBO AFTER IMPACTED 3RD MOLAR REMOVAL
    DIONNE, RA
    SNYDER, J
    HARGREAVES, KM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1994, 52 (09) : 919 - 924
  • [9] Ehrich EW, 1999, J RHEUMATOL, V26, P2438
  • [10] FORBES JA, 1990, PHARMACOTHERAPY, V10, pS94