Validation and clinical application of the German version of the palliative care outcome scale

被引:89
作者
Bausewein, C
Fegg, M
Radbruch, L
Nauck, F
von Mackensen, S
Borasio, GD
Higginson, IJ
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Interdisciplinary Ctr Palliat Med, Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Aachen, Dept Palliat Med, D-5100 Aachen, Germany
[3] Univ Bonn, Ctr Palliat Med, Malteser Hosp, D-5300 Bonn, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Ctr Psychosoical Med, Inst Med Psychol, Hamburg, Germany
[5] Univ London Kings Coll, Dept Palliat Care & Policy, London, England
关键词
palliative care; outcome measures; quality of life; German;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.01.017
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS) is a multidimensional instrument covering physical, psychosocial, spiritual, organizational, and practical concerns. This study validated the German version of the POS and used the tool in different palliative cart, settings in. Germany and Austria. Patients and staff were asked to complete the POS three times and evaluate the questionnaire and the translation afterwards. One hundred eighteen, Patients (44 male, 74 female, mean age 63 years, all suffering from advanced cancer completed the POS one time, 55 patients two times, and 36 patients three times. Spearman.'s rho was highly significant for Pain, other symptoms, anxiety, and life worthwhile in the first two assessments. The third assessment showed significant correlations for Pain, other symptoms, anxiety, and family anxiety. Seventy-seven of 8 7 patients answered questions regarding the scale and the translation. All questions other than "Over the past 3 days, have you fell good about yourself? were understandable for patients. Almost ha ( of the staff was undecided whether the tool was reflecting the patients' condition. In contrast, the majority of patients liked it. Thus, the German version of the POS is well accepted by patients and staff and appears to be valid, although there are some areas Where the scale would benefit from expansion to more closely capture staff and patient concerns.(c) 2005 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All fights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 62
页数:12
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]
THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]
[Anonymous], 2002, USERS GUIDE PALLIATI
[3]
CHIDGEY J, 2000, USE PALLIATIVE CARE
[4]
CULL A, 1998, EORTC QUALIYT LIFE S
[5]
Outcome measures in palliative care for advanced cancer patients: A review [J].
Hearn, J ;
Higginson, IJ .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 1997, 19 (02) :193-199
[6]
Development and validation of a core outcome measure for palliative care: the palliative care outcome scale [J].
Hearn, J ;
Higginson, IJ .
QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 1999, 8 (04) :219-227
[7]
HIGGINSON IJ, 2000, INNOVATIONS END OF L, V2
[8]
HIGGINSON IJ, 2003, QUALITY LIFE, P63
[9]
The Royal Free Interview for Spiritual and Religious Beliefs: development and validation of a self-report version [J].
King, M ;
Speck, P ;
Thomas, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2001, 31 (06) :1015-1023
[10]
LINDENA G, 1999, UNPUB QUALITATSSICHE