Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and gleason score for predicting prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

被引:35
作者
Poulakis, V
Witzsch, U
De Vries, R
Emmerlich, V
Nieves, M
Altmannsberger, HM
Becht, E
机构
[1] Krankenhaus NW Frankfurt, Dept Urol, D-60488 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Frankfurt, Teaching Hosp, Dept Urol, Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Univ Frankfurt, Teaching Hosp, Dept Pediat Urol, Frankfurt, Germany
[4] Univ Frankfurt, Teaching Hosp, Dept Radiol, Frankfurt, Germany
[5] Univ Frankfurt, Teaching Hosp, Inst Pathol, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.030
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objectives. To develop and test an artificial neural network (ANN) for predicting biochemical recurrence based on the combined use of pelvic coil magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement, and biopsy Gleason score, after radical prostatectomy and to investigate whether it is more accurate than logistic regression analysis (LRA) in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Methods. We evaluated 191 consecutive men who had undergone retropubic radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. None of the men had lymph node metastasis as determined by adequate follow-up and pathologic criteria. The preoperative predictive variables included clinical TNM stage, serum PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, and pMRI findings. The predicted result was biochemical failure (PSA level of 0.1 ng/mL or greater). The patient data were randomly split into four cross-validation sets and used to develop and validate the LRA and ANN models. The predictive ability of the ANN was compared with that of LRA, Han tables, and the Kattan nomogram using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis. Results. Of the 191 patients, 57 (30%) developed disease progression at a median follow-up of 64 months (mean 61, range 2 to 86). Using all the input variables, the AUROC of the ANN was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than the AUROC of LRA, Han tables, or the Kattan nomogram for the prediction of PSA recurrence 5 years after radical prostatectomy (0.897 +/- 0.063 versus 0.785 +/- 0.060, 0.733 +/- 0.061, and 0.737 +/- 0.071, respectively). Removing the pMRI findings from the previous models, the AUROC of the ANN decreased statistically significantly (P < 0.05) and was comparable to the AUROC of conventional predictive tools (P > 0.05). Conclusions. Using the pMRI findings, the ANN was superior to LRA, predictive tables, and nomograms to predict biochemical recurrence accurately. Confirmatory studies are warranted. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1165 / 1170
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1997, TNM CLASSIFICATION M
[2]
Bishop C. M, 1995, NEURAL NETWORKS PATT
[3]
Extraprostatic spread of clinically localized prostate cancer:: Factors predictive of pT3 tumor and of positive endorectal MR imaging examination results [J].
Cornud, F ;
Flam, T ;
Chauveinc, L ;
Hamida, K ;
Chrétien, Y ;
Vieillefond, A ;
Hélénon, O ;
Moreau, JF .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (01) :203-210
[4]
Clinical utility of the percentage of positive prostate biopsies in defining biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Fondurulia, J ;
Chen, MH ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Wein, A ;
Richie, JP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (06) :1164-1172
[5]
Critical analysis of the ability of the endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging scan to predict pathologic stage, margin status, and postoperative prostate-specific antigen failure in patients with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer [J].
DAmico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Schnall, M ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Wein, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (06) :1770-1777
[6]
Defining the ideal cutpoint for determining PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Sutter, ME ;
Dorey, F ;
Aronson, WJ .
UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (02) :365-369
[7]
International validation of a preoperative nomogram for prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Graefen, M ;
Karakiewicz, PI ;
Cagiannos, I ;
Quinn, DI ;
Henshall, SM ;
Grygiel, JJ ;
Sutherland, RL ;
Stricker, PD ;
Klein, E ;
Kupelian, P ;
Skinner, DG ;
Lieskovsky, G ;
Bochner, B ;
Huland, H ;
Hammerer, PG ;
Haese, A ;
Erbersdobler, A ;
Eastham, JA ;
de Kernion, J ;
Cangiano, T ;
Schröder, FH ;
Wildhagen, MF ;
van der Kwast, TH ;
Scardino, PT ;
Kattan, MW .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (15) :3206-3212
[8]
Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Han, M ;
Partin, AW ;
Zahurak, M ;
Piantadosi, S ;
Epstein, JI ;
Walsh, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (02) :517-523
[9]
Han Misop, 2002, Semin Urol Oncol, V20, P123, DOI 10.1053/suro.2002.32493
[10]
A METHOD OF COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES DERIVED FROM THE SAME CASES [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1983, 148 (03) :839-843