Quantification of axial alignment of the lower extremity on conventional and digital total leg radiographs

被引:71
作者
Sailer, J
Scharitzer, M
Peloschek, P
Giurea, A
Imhof, H
Grampp, S
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Klin Radiodiagnost, Abt Osteoradiol, Fak Med, Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Vienna, Orthopad Klin, Fak Med, Vienna, Austria
关键词
digital radiography; lower limb alignment; computer-assisted angle measurement;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-004-2436-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
The purpose was to assess axial alignment of the lower limb using mechanical axis measurements on conventional and digital radiographs. Total-leg radiographs of 24 patients, 8 male and 16 female, with a mean age of 68.6 +/- 10.2 years, were performed in a standardized anteriorposterior projection and standing position using a conventional and digital phosphor storage film screen radiography system. Knee joint angulation was assessed by measuring the angle between a line drawn from the center of the femoral head to the middle of the femoral condyles and a line drawn from the middle of the tibial condyles to the midpoint of the malleolus. On conventional leg radiographs, line drawing and angle measurement were performed manually with a transparent goniometer. Angle measurement on digital leg radiographs was performed on a PACS workstation using computer-assisted measurement software (IMPAX, AGFA-GEVAERT, Belgium). Evaluation time for both measurements was recorded. We diagnosed 14 varus and 10 valgus angulations of the knee joint. The mean individual difference between axis deviation of conventional digital leg radiographs was 0.93 +/- 0.6degrees(min 0degrees, max 2degrees), the mean difference in varus angulation was 1.13 +/- 0.45degrees (min 0.3degrees, max 2degrees), and the mean difference in valgus angulation was 0.65 +/- 0.71degrees (min 0degrees, max 2degrees). Angle measurements on conventional and digital radiographs did not show any statistically significant difference. Mean time exposure was 4.9 min/patient for manual and 1.08 min/patient for computer-assisted angle measurement (P<0.001). Computer-assisted angle measurement on digital total-leg radiographs represents a reliable method with no significant angle differences compared to conventional radiographic systems and offers a significantly lower evaluation time.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 173
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]
Are digital images good enough? A comparative study of conventional film-screen vs digital radiographs on printed images of total hip replacement [J].
Eklund, K ;
Jonsson, K ;
Lindblom, G ;
Lundin, B ;
Sanfridsson, J ;
Sloth, M ;
Sivberg, B .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (05) :865-869
[2]
Grampp S, 2003, RADIOLOGE, V43, P362, DOI 10.1007/s00117-003-0895-6
[3]
Imhof H, 2002, RADIOLOGE, V42, P344, DOI 10.1007/s00117-002-0725-2
[4]
Developments in digital radiography: an equipment update [J].
James, JJ ;
Davies, AG ;
Cowen, AR ;
O'Connor, PJ .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (12) :2616-2626
[5]
A MATHEMATICAL-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF FLEXION AND ROTATION ON APPARENT VARUS VALGUS ALIGNMENT AT THE KNEE [J].
KRACKOW, KA ;
PEPE, CL ;
GALLOWAY, EJ .
ORTHOPEDICS, 1990, 13 (08) :861-868
[6]
INFLUENCE OF POSITIONING OF PROSTHESIS IN TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT [J].
LOTKE, PA ;
ECKER, ML .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1977, 59 (01) :77-79
[7]
May GA, 2000, J DIGIT IMAGING, V13, P76, DOI 10.1053/jdim.2000.6832
[8]
RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE AXIAL ALIGNMENT OF THE LOWER-EXTREMITY [J].
MORELAND, JR ;
BASSETT, LW ;
HANKER, GJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1987, 69A (05) :745-749
[9]
ODENBRING S, 1993, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P195
[10]
PALEY D, 1992, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P48