The Word Frequency Effect A Review of Recent Developments and Implications for the Choice of Frequency Estimates in German

被引:328
作者
Brysbaert, Marc [1 ]
Buchmeier, Matthias [2 ]
Conrad, Markus [3 ]
Jacobs, Arthur M. [3 ]
Boelte, Jens [2 ]
Boehl, Andrea [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Expt Psychol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Munster, D-4400 Munster, Germany
[3] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
关键词
word frequency; word recognition; lexical decision; megastudy; RECOGNITION MEMORY; LEXICON PROJECT; FILM SUBTITLES; AGE; FRENCH; ENGLISH; FRANCIS; KUCERA; ACCESS; NORMS;
D O I
10.1027/1618-3169/a000123
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
010107 [宗教学];
摘要
We review recent evidence indicating that researchers in experimental psychology may have used suboptimal estimates of word frequency. Word frequency measures should be based on a corpus of at least 20 million words that contains language participants in psychology experiments are likely to have been exposed to. In addition, the quality of word frequency measures should be ascertained by correlating them with behavioral word processing data. When we apply these criteria to the word frequency measures available for the German language, we find that the commonly used Celex frequencies are the least powerful to predict lexical decision times. Better results are obtained with the Leipzig frequencies, the dlexDB frequencies, and the Google Books 2000-2009 frequencies. However, as in other languages the best performance is observed with subtitle-based word frequencies. The SUBTLEX-DE word frequencies collected for the present ms are made available in easy-to-use files and are free for educational purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 424
页数:13
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]
Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words [J].
Baayen, R. H. ;
Feldman, L. B. ;
Schreuder, R. .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2006, 55 (02) :290-313
[2]
Visual word recognition of single-syllable words [J].
Balota, DA ;
Cortese, MJ ;
Sergent-Marshall, SD ;
Spieler, DH ;
Yap, MJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2004, 133 (02) :283-316
[3]
The English Lexicon Project [J].
Balota, David A. ;
Yap, Melvin J. ;
Cortese, Michael J. ;
Hutchison, Keith A. ;
Kessler, Brett ;
Loftis, Bjorn ;
Neely, James H. ;
Nelson, Douglas L. ;
Simpson, Greg B. ;
Treiman, Rebecca .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (03) :445-459
[4]
Biemann C., 2007, Proceedings of Corpus Linguistic
[5]
BOHL A, 2007, THESIS WESTFALISCHE
[6]
Bontrager T., 1991, READ PSYCHOL, V12, P91, DOI DOI 10.1080/0270271910120201
[7]
Assessing the usefulness of Google Books' word frequencies for psycholinguistic research on word processing [J].
Brysbaert, Marc ;
Keuleers, Emmanuel ;
New, Boris .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 2
[8]
Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms? [J].
Brysbaert, Marc ;
Cortese, Michael J. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 64 (03) :545-559
[9]
Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English [J].
Brysbaert, Marc ;
New, Boris .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2009, 41 (04) :977-990
[10]
The effect of corpus size in predicting reaction time in a basic word recognition task: Moving on from Kucera and Francis [J].
Burgess, C ;
Livesay, K .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 1998, 30 (02) :272-277