Conditional Fisher's exact test as a selection criterion for pair-correlation method.: Type I and Type II errors

被引:33
作者
Rajkó, R
Héberger, K
机构
[1] Univ Szeged, Inst Food Ind Coll, Dept Unit Operat & Environm Engn, H-6701 Szeged, Hungary
[2] Hungarian Acad Sci, Chem Res Ctr, Inst Chem, H-1525 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
variable (or feature) selection; pair-correlation method (PCM);
D O I
10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00101-0
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The pair-correlation method (PCM) has been developed recently for discrimination between two variables. PCM can be used to identify the decisive (fundamental, basic) factor from among correlated variables even in cases when all other statistical criteria fail to indicate significant difference, These decisions are needed frequently in QSAR studies and/or chemical model building. The conditional Fisher's exact test, based on resting significance in the 2 X 2 contingency tables is a suitable selection criterion for PCM. The test statistic provides a probabilistic aid for accepting the hypothesis of significant differences between two factors, which are almost equally correlated with the response (dependent variable), Differentiating between factors can lead to alternative models at any arbitrary significance level. The power function of the test statistic has also been deduced theoretically. A similar derivation was undertaken for the description of the influence of Type I (false positive conclusion. error of the first kind) and Type II (false-negative conclusion, error of the second kind) errors. The appropriate decision is indicated from the low probability levels of both false conclusions. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Abramowitz M., 1972, HDB MATH FUNCTIONS F
[2]  
[Anonymous], J STAT ED
[3]  
Casagrande J. T., 1978, Applied Statistics, V27, P212, DOI 10.2307/2346959
[4]   Elimination of uninformative variables for multivariate calibration [J].
Centner, V ;
Massart, DL ;
deNoord, OE ;
deJong, S ;
Vandeginste, BM ;
Sterna, C .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 68 (21) :3851-3858
[5]  
CONLON M, 1993, J R STAT SOC C-APPL, V42, P258
[6]  
CONOVER WJ, 1980, PRACTICAL NONPARAMET, pCH4
[7]  
Dunn O., 1987, APPL STAT ANAL VARIA
[8]   Determining the optimal sample size in forensic casework - with application to fibres [J].
Faber, NM ;
Sjerps, M ;
Leijenhorst, H ;
Maljaars, SE .
SCIENCE & JUSTICE, 1999, 39 (02) :113-122
[9]  
FINNEY DJ, 1963, TABLES TESTING SIGNI
[10]   The logic of inductive inference [J].
Fisher, RA .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY, 1935, 98 :39-82