Writing in Multimodal texts - A social semiotic account of designs for learning

被引:331
作者
Bezerner, Jeff
Kress, Gunther
机构
[1] Tilburg University, Tilburg
[2] Institute of Education, Centre for Multimodal Research, London
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
writing; multimodality; representation; communication; multimedia; curriculum; pedagogy; textbooks; learning; learning resources;
D O I
10.1177/0741088307313177
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Frequently writing is now no longer the central mode of representation in learning materials-textbooks, Web-based resources, teacher-produced materials. Still (as well as moving) images are increasingly prominent as carriers of meaning. Uses and forms of writing have undergone profound changes over the last decades, which calls for a social, pedagogical, and semiotic explanation. Two trends mark that history. The digital media, rather than the (text) book, are more and more the site of appearance and distribution of learning resources, and writing is being displaced by image as the central mode for representation. This poses sharp questions about present and future roles and forms of writing. For text, design and principles of composition move into the foreground. Here we sketch a social semiotic account that aims to elucidate such principles and permits consideration of their epistemological as well as social/pedagogic significance. Linking representation with social factors, we put forward terms to explore two issues: the principles underlying the design of multimodal ensembles and the potential epistemological and pedagogic effects of multimodal designs. Our investigation is set within a research project with a corpus of learning resources for secondary school in Science, Mathematics, and English from the 1930s, the 1980s, and from the first decade of the 21st century, as well as digitally represented and online learning resources from the year 2000 onward.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 195
页数:30
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, LIT NEW MEDIA AGE
[2]  
Baker C.D., 1981, LANGUAGE AUTHORITY C, P263
[3]  
Bernstein B., 1996, PEDAGOGY SYMBOLIC CO
[4]  
CHAPMAN C, 2003, CATALYST FRAMEWORK S, V2
[5]  
COLE G, 1999, IMPACT MATHS 1G
[6]   Towards an analysis of visual images in school science textbooks and press articles about science and technology [J].
Dimopoulos, K ;
Koulaidis, V ;
Sklaveniti, S .
RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2003, 33 (02) :189-216
[7]  
FAIRBROTHER F, 1935, GEN SCI 3
[8]  
Goffman Erving, 1986, FRAME ANAL ESSAY ORG
[9]   Action and embodiment within situated human interaction [J].
Goodwin, C .
JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2000, 32 (10) :1489-1522
[10]  
Halliday M., 1985, INTRO FUNCTIONAL GRA