Medium-Sized (3.1-5.0 cm) Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Alone

This study was designed to retrospectively compare the effectiveness of combined transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with that of RFA alone in patients with medium-sized (3.1-5.0 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). From March 2000 to April 2010, 57 patients, each with a single medium-sized HCC, were treated with combined TACE and RFA, and 66 were treated with RFA alone. During follow-up (mean, 42.5 +/- A 33.2 months; range, 2.6-126.2 months), local tumor progression was observed in 40% of treated lesions in the combined treatment group and in 70% in the RFA-alone group. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year local tumor progression rates were significantly lower in the TACE + RFA group (9%, 40%, 55%, and 66%, respectively) than in the RFA-alone group (45%, 76%, 86%, and 89%, respectively; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment allocation (odds ratio [OR], 1.78; P = 0.016) and Child-Pugh class (OR, 1.96; P = 0.008) were significant independent factors associated with patient survival. The rates of major complications were 0% for the combined treatment group and 3% for the RFA-alone group. The combination of TACE and RFA is safe and provides better local tumor control than RFA alone for the treatment of patients with medium-sized HCC. Our multivariate analysis showed that RFA-alone treatment and Child-Pugh class B were poor independent factors for determining the patient survival period.