The independent evolution of resistance to ciprofloxacin, rifampicin, and fusidic acid in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Australian teaching hospitals (1990-1995)

被引:21
作者
Gottlieb, T
Mitchell, D
机构
[1] Concord Hosp, Dept Microbiol & Infect Dis, Sydney, NSW 2139, Australia
[2] Westmead Hosp, ICPMR, Dept Microbiol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jac/42.1.67
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 [流行病与卫生统计学];
摘要
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is endemic in teaching hospitals in eastern Australian states, with prevalence rates averaging 25-30% of all S. aureus. Between 1990 and 1995, 1467 non-duplicate MRSA isolates from clinically infected sites were tested in Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane as part of a national survey of staphylococcal susceptibility. We reviewed the differing evolution of resistance to ciprofloxacin, rifampicin, and fusidic acid. Despite similarities in community and hospital antibiotic use and URSA prevalence rates, trends in resistance to the oral antibiotics in these cities have progressed independently of each other. In the 1995 survey in individual hospitals in Melbourne, 16-24% of strains were ciprofloxacin-resistant, compared with 80-100% in Sydney and 30-44% in Brisbane. There was great diversity of phage type patterns for ciprofloxacin-resistant strains, suggesting heterogeneous development of resistance. Rifampicin resistance was more closely associated with distinct dominant epidemic phage types, common to institutions in the same city, but without spread to the other cities. Between 1990 and 1995, these comprised 30-60% of all MRSA in Brisbane, compared with 5-10% in Melbourne and <25% in Sydney. Fusidic acid resistance was uncommon and sporadic (<5%), and was distributed equally between methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible strains. Resistance to the oral agents in MRSA is due to a complex mix of antibiotic selection pressures and cross-infection with local and epidemic strains in closely related institutions. Each of these mechanisms can predominate, dependent on local factors and the antibiotics used.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 73
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
ACAR JF, 1997, CLIN INFECT DIS S1, V24, P67
[2]
THE RAPID EMERGENCE OF FLUOROQUINOLONE METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS INFECTIONS IN A COMMUNITY-HOSPITAL - AN INVITRO LOOK AT ALTERNATIVE ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS [J].
ALDRIDGE, KE ;
GELFAND, MS ;
SCHIRO, DD ;
BARG, NL .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1992, 15 (07) :601-608
[3]
*ANT GUID SUBC VIC, 1995, ANT GUID
[4]
METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS [J].
BRUMFITT, W ;
HAMILTONMILLER, J .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 320 (18) :1188-1196
[5]
CIPROFLOXACIN-RESISTANT METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS IN NEW-YORK HEALTH-CARE FACILITIES, 1988 [J].
BUDNICK, LD ;
SCHAEFLER, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1990, 80 (07) :810-813
[6]
SUSCEPTIBILITY TO FUSIDIC ACID AMONG DANISH STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS STRAINS AND FUSIDIC ACID CONSUMPTION [J].
FABER, M ;
ROSDAHL, VT .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1990, 25 :7-14
[7]
10 YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS IN A LARGE AUSTRALIAN HOSPITAL [J].
FAOAGALI, JL ;
THONG, ML ;
GRANT, D .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1992, 20 (02) :113-119
[8]
FUNNEL G, 1993, ANN SCI M AUSTR SOC, pA123
[9]
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility [J].
Hiramatsu, K ;
Hanaki, H ;
Ino, T ;
Yabuta, K ;
Oguri, T ;
Tenover, FC .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1997, 40 (01) :135-136
[10]
Typing multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Conflicting epidemiological data produced by genotypic and phenotypic methods clarified by phylogenetic analysis [J].
Jorgensen, M ;
Givney, R ;
Pegler, M ;
Vickery, A ;
Funnell, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1996, 34 (02) :398-403