Recent changes in flood preparedness of private households and businesses in Germany

被引:137
作者
Kreibich, Heidi [1 ]
Seifert, Isabel [2 ]
Thieken, Annegret H. [3 ]
Lindquist, Eric [4 ]
Wagner, Klaus [5 ]
Merz, Bruno [1 ]
机构
[1] Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam Germany Res Ctr Geosci GFZ, Sect Hydrol 5 4, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Norwegian Inst Water Res NIVA, Sect Climate & Environm Modelling, Oslo, Norway
[3] Leopold Franzens Univ Innsbruck, Ctr Nat Hazard & Risk Management, AlpS, Innsbruck, Austria
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Inst Sci Technol & Publ Policy, College Stn, TX USA
[5] Tech Univ Munich, Chair Forest & Environm Policy, D-8050 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
关键词
Emergency measures; Flood management; Focusing event; Learning; Precautionary measures; EXTREME EVENTS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ELBE FLOOD; RISK; MITIGATION; PERCEPTIONS; UNCERTAINTY; RESIDENTS; PEOPLE; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1007/s10113-010-0119-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Using the focusing event framework, a comprehensive analysis of private households' and businesses' preparedness was undertaken in the aftermath of the 2002 and 2006 flood events on the Elbe River in Germany. In August 2002, preparedness of households (n = 235) and businesses (n = 103) was low: 30% of the households and 54% of the businesses took no precautionary measures before the flood event. Many undertaken emergency measures were ineffective, since only 26% of all households knew how to react when the flood warning came, and only 9% of businesses had an emergency plan in place. Due to this extreme flood, double-loop learning occurred in many households and businesses, so that many did implement precautionary measures. The distribution of adopted precautionary measures for households fits well to Preisendorfer's low-cost hypothesis, but does not apply for businesses. Only 10% of the households (n = 112), but still 29% of the businesses (n = 41) were unprepared before the flood in 2006. Significant improvement in flood preparedness activities is still necessary. Particularly for businesses, regulatory programs and programs encouraging proactive behaviour should be implemented. The focusing event framework proofed to be a useful tool for a differentiated analysis of the responses to and learning due to a disaster also in the commercial and private sector.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 71
页数:13
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, NONSTR FLOOD PLAIN M
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, 9000 ISO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, AGENDAS ALTERNATIVES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, SPSS 11 0 GUIDE DATA
[5]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[6]  
Argyris C., 1978, Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective
[7]  
Argyris C., 1996, Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice, V2
[8]  
*BAD, 2005, HOCH BAD UM BAD
[9]   Assessing uncertainty in extreme events: Applications to risk-based decision making in interdependent infrastructure sectors [J].
Barker, Kash ;
Haimes, Yacov Y. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (04) :819-829
[10]  
*BAYERN, 2005, INF UB GEB BAYERN BA