Outcome after traumatic brain injury: Pathway analysis of contributions from premorbid, injury severity, and recovery variables

被引:166
作者
Novack, TA [1 ]
Bush, BA [1 ]
Meythaler, JM [1 ]
Canupp, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Spain Rehabil Ctr, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2001年 / 82卷 / 03期
关键词
brain injuries; traumatic; treatment outcome; rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1053/apmr.2001.18222
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the relationship of premorbid variables, injury severity, and cognitive and functional status to outcome 1 year after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to assess the feasibility of multivariate path analysis as a way to discover those relationships. Design: Prospective, longitudinal. Settings: Level I trauma center, acute inpatient rehabilitation hospital. Patients: One hundred seven subjects (87 men, 20 women; mean age, 33.91 +/- 14.2 yr) who had experienced severe TBI, typically from motor vehicle crashes. Interventions: Acute medical and rehabilitation care. Main Outcome Measures: Disability Rating Scale, Community Integration Questionnaire, and return to employment. Evaluated in acute rehabilitation, and at 6 and 12 months' postinjury. Results: Path analyses revealed that premorbid factors had significant relationships with injury severity, functional skills, cognitive status, and outcome; injury severity affected cognitive and functional skills; and cognitive status influenced outcome. No significant relationships were found between injury severity and emotional status, injury severity and outcome, emotional status and outcome, and functional skills and outcome. Conclusions: Multivariate analysis is important to understanding outcome after TBI. Injury severity, as measured in this study, is less important to 12-month outcome than the premorbid status of the person and the difficulties (particularly cognitive deficits) exhibited at follow-up 6 months after the trauma.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 305
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1985, HALSTEAD REITAN NEUR
[2]  
Benton A. L., 1983, MULTILINGUAL APHASIA, DOI [DOI 10.1037/T10132-000, 10.1037/t10132-000]
[3]   Acute predictors of successful return to work 1 year after traumatic brain injury: A multicenter analysis [J].
Cifu, DX ;
KeyserMarcus, L ;
Lopez, E ;
Wehman, P ;
Kreutzer, JS ;
Englander, J ;
High, W .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1997, 78 (02) :125-131
[4]   Outcomes in the first 5 years after traumatic brain injury [J].
Corrigan, JD ;
Smith-Knapp, K ;
Granger, CV .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1998, 79 (03) :298-305
[5]  
DELIS DC, 1987, CALIFORNIA VERBAL LE
[6]   EMPLOYMENT FOLLOWING TRAUMATIC HEAD-INJURIES [J].
DIKMEN, SS ;
TEMKIN, NR ;
MACHAMER, JE ;
HOLUBKOV, AL ;
FRASER, RT ;
WINN, R .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1994, 51 (02) :177-186
[7]   NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL OUTCOME AT 1-YEAR POST HEAD-INJURY [J].
DIKMEN, SS ;
MACHAMER, JE ;
WINN, HR ;
TEMKIN, NR .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 9 (01) :80-90
[8]  
EWING JA, 1984, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V252, P27
[9]   Prediction of employment outcome one to three years following traumatic brain injury (TBI) [J].
Gollaher, K ;
High, W ;
Sherer, M ;
Bergloff, P ;
Boake, C ;
Young, ME ;
Ivanhoe, C .
BRAIN INJURY, 1998, 12 (04) :255-263
[10]  
Hamilton B., 1987, Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement, V1st