Bayesian decoding of brain images

被引:149
作者
Friston, Karl J.
Chu, Carlton
Mourao-Miranda, Janaina
Hulme, Oliver
Rees, Geraint
Penny, Will
Ashburner, John
机构
[1] UCL, Neurol Inst, Wellcome Trust Ctr Neuroimaging, London WC1N 3BG, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, Ctr Neuroimaging Sci, Dept Biostat, London, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
parametric empirical Bayes; expectation maximisation; Gaussian process; automatic relevance determination; relevance vector machines; classification; multivariate; support vector machines;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.013
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This paper introduces a multivariate Bayesian (MVB) scheme to decode or recognise brain states from neuroimages. It resolves the ill-posed many-to-one mapping, from voxel values or data features to a target variable, using a parametric empirical or hierarchical Bayesian model. This model is inverted using standard variational techniques, in this case expectation maximisation, to furnish the model evidence and the conditional density of the model's parameters. This allows one to compare different models or hypotheses about the mapping from functional or structural anatomy to perceptual and behavioural consequences (or their deficits). We frame this approach in terms of decoding measured brain states to predict or classify outcomes using the rhetoric established in pattern classification of neuroimaging data. However, the aim of MVB is not to predict (because the outcomes are known) but to enable inference on different models of structure-function mappings; such as distributed and sparse representations. This allows one to optimise the model itself and produce predictions that outperform standard pattern classification approaches, like support vector machines. Technically, the model inversion and inference uses the same empirical Bayesian procedures developed for ill-posed inverse problems (e.g., source reconstruction in EEG). However, the MVB scheme used here extends this approach to include a greedy search for sparse solutions. It reduces the problem to the same form used in Gaussian process modelling, which affords a generic and efficient scheme for model optimisation and evaluating model evidence. We illustrate MVB using simulated and real data, with a special focus on model comparison; where models can differ in the form of the mapping (i.e., neuronal representation) within one region, or in the (combination of) regions per se. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 205
页数:25
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, The Nature Statist. Learn. Theory
[2]   Unified segmentation [J].
Ashburner, J ;
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 2005, 26 (03) :839-851
[3]  
BEAL MJ, 1998, THESIS, P58
[4]  
Bishop C. M., 2000, P 16 C UNC ART INT S, P46
[5]   Characterizing stimulus-response functions using nonlinear regressors in parametric fMRI experiments [J].
Buchel, C ;
Holmes, AP ;
Rees, G ;
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 1998, 8 (02) :140-148
[6]  
Carlson TA, 2003, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V15, P704, DOI 10.1162/089892903322307429
[7]   Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) "brain reading": detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex [J].
Cox, DD ;
Savoy, RL .
NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 19 (02) :261-270
[8]   MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD FROM INCOMPLETE DATA VIA EM ALGORITHM [J].
DEMPSTER, AP ;
LAIRD, NM ;
RUBIN, DB .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1977, 39 (01) :1-38
[9]   STEINS ESTIMATION RULE AND ITS COMPETITORS - EMPIRICAL BAYES APPROACH [J].
EFRON, B ;
MORRIS, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1973, 68 (341) :117-130
[10]  
Feynman R. P., 1972, STAT MECH