When are bioavailability studies required? A German proposal

被引:26
作者
Gleiter, CH
Klotz, U
Kuhlmann, J
Blume, H
Stanislaus, F
Harder, S
Paulus, H
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Klin Pharmakol Abt, D-37075 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Dr Margarete Fischer Bosch Inst Clin Pharmacol, D-7000 Stuttgart, Germany
[3] Bayer AG, Inst Klin Pharmacol, D-5600 Wuppertal, Germany
[4] Zent Lab Deutsch Apotheker, Eschborn, Germany
[5] Klinge Pharma GMBH, Munich, Germany
[6] Univ Frankfurt, Klin Pharmakol Abt, D-6000 Frankfurt, Germany
[7] ZinstSanBw, Munich, Germany
[8] Budesinst Arzneimittel & Med Prod, Berlin, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1002/j.1552-4604.1998.tb04385.x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The Bundesinstitut fur Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte (BfArM), the German drug regulation authority, issued guidelines for determining whether bioavailability/bioequivalence studies are required for certain drugs. This decision tree is based on pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and physicochemical criteria. Details of this decision tree were worked out by an expert panel, the Bioavailability Commission at the BfArM. The decision tree has been in use by German regulatory authorities for more than 10 years. In the meantime, its essentials were adopted by the European Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) and by the World Health Organization (WHO) for their "Guidelines on interchangeability of multisource pharmaceutical products." This article reviews the original decision tree of the BfArM and provides examples of drugs that have been assessed according to its rules. The current procedure of the German regulatory authorities for judging the necessity of bioavailability trials, which reflects the status quo of regulatory practice in Germany is also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:904 / 911
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
AIACHE JM, 1995, DRUGS MADE GERMANY, V38, P50
[2]   A THEORETICAL BASIS FOR A BIOPHARMACEUTIC DRUG CLASSIFICATION - THE CORRELATION OF IN-VITRO DRUG PRODUCT DISSOLUTION AND IN-VIVO BIOAVAILABILITY [J].
AMIDON, GL ;
LENNERNAS, H ;
SHAH, VP ;
CRISON, JR .
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 1995, 12 (03) :413-420
[3]  
*APV, 1987, DRUGS MADE GERMANY, V30, P161
[4]   BIO-INTERNATIONAL-94, CONFERENCE ON BIOAVAILABILITY, BIOEQUIVALENCE AND PHARMACOKINETIC STUDIES - PRE-CONFERENCE SATELLITE ON IN-VIVO IN-VITRO CORRELATION - MUNICH, GERMANY, 14-17 JUNE 1994 [J].
BLUME, HH ;
MCGILVERAY, IJ ;
MIDHA, KK .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 3 (02) :113-124
[5]  
*EUR COMM, 1991, INV BIOAV BIOEQ RUL, V3, P149
[6]   BIOINEQUIVALENCE AND DRUG TOXICITY - HOW GREAT IS THE PROBLEM AND WHAT CAN BE DONE [J].
GLEITER, CH ;
GUNDERTREMY, U .
DRUG SAFETY, 1994, 11 (01) :1-6
[7]   Bioequivalence assessment: A pharmaceutical industry perspective [J].
Godbillon, J ;
Cardot, JM ;
Lecaillon, JB ;
Lefevre, G ;
Sioufi, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DRUG METABOLISM AND PHARMACOKINETICS, 1996, 21 (02) :153-158
[8]   Interpatient variability in bioavailability is related to the extent of absorption: Implications for bioavailability and bioequivalence studies [J].
Hellriegel, ET ;
Bjornsson, TD ;
Hauck, WW .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1996, 60 (06) :601-607
[9]   Bioequivalence assessment and the conduct of bioequivalence trials: A European point of view [J].
Herchuelz, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DRUG METABOLISM AND PHARMACOKINETICS, 1996, 21 (02) :149-152
[10]  
HOLZSLOMCZYK M, 1995, BIOINTERNATIONAL, V2, P233