Effects of the synthetic estrogen 17α-ethinylestradiol on the life-cycle of the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas)

被引:540
作者
Länge, R
Hutchinson, TH
Croudace, CP
Siegmund, F
Schweinfurth, H
Hampe, P
Panter, GH
Sumpter, JP
机构
[1] Schering AG, Res Labs, Expt Toxikol, D-13342 Berlin, Germany
[2] AstraZeneca, Brixham Environm Lab, Brixham TQ5 8BA, Devon, England
[3] Brunel Univ, Dept Biol & Biochem, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
关键词
ethinylestradiol; endocrine disruptor; estrogen; life-cycle; fish;
D O I
10.1002/etc.5620200610
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A fish full life-cycle (FFLC) study was conducted for 17 alpha -ethinylestradiol (EE2) using the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas. Newly fertilized embryos (< 24 h old) were exposed to five concentrations of EE2 (0.2, 1.0, 4.0, 16, and 64 ng/L nominal) in continuous flow-through conditions for 305 d at 25 :+/- 1 degreesC. Exposure concentrations were verified by C-14-EE2 radiochemistry, supported by radioimmunoassay, and mean measured values were greater than or equal to 70% of nominal. For the F-0 adult phase until 301 d posthatch, the no-observed-effect concentrations (NOECs) for growth, survival, and reproduction (as egg production) were all greater than or equal to1.0 ng/L. The NOEC values for F-1 embryo hatching success and larval survival (at 28 d posthatch) were both greater than or equal to 1.0 ng/L. While statistically detectable changes in F-1 growth were evident at 0.2 ng/L, these were not considered to be biologically significant when compared with historical control data. Male fish exposed to EE2 at 4.0 ng/L failed to develop normal secondary sexual characteristics; on the other hand, assumed females exposed to this level of EE2 were able to breed when paired with males that had not been exposed to EE2. Histology of F-0 control, 0.2-, and 1-ng/L exposed fish at 56 d posthatch indicated an approximate female-to-male (F:M) sex ratio of 50:50 (with no ovatestes observed in the control), while fish exposed to EE, at 4.0 ng/L for 56 d posthatch had a F: M sex ratio of 84:5 (with ovatestes in 11 % of fish). After 172 d posthatch, no testicular tissue was observed in any fish exposed to EE2 at 4.0 ng/L. At the same time point, plasma vitellogenin levels were significantly higher in fish exposed to EE2 at 16 ng/ L. A lack of sexual differentiation occurred in males at concentrations greater than or equal to4.0 ng/L. Taking into account these data, the overall noobserved-adverse-effect concentration was considered to be 1.0 ng/L.
引用
收藏
页码:1216 / 1227
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] THE RELEVANCE OF THE PRESENCE OF CERTAIN SYNTHETIC STEROIDS IN THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT
    AHERNE, GW
    BRIGGS, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 41 (10) : 735 - 736
  • [2] Overview of a workshop on screening methods for detecting potential (anti-) estrogenic/androgenic chemicals in wildlife
    Ankley, G
    Mihaich, E
    Stahl, R
    Tillitt, D
    Colborn, T
    McMaster, S
    Miller, R
    Bantle, J
    Campbell, P
    Denslow, N
    Dickerson, R
    Folmar, L
    Fry, M
    Giesy, J
    Gray, LE
    Guiney, P
    Hutchinson, T
    Kennedy, S
    Kramer, V
    LeBlanc, G
    Mayes, M
    Nimrod, A
    Patino, R
    Peterson, R
    Purdy, R
    Ringer, R
    Thomas, P
    Touart, L
    Van der Kraak, G
    Zacharewski, T
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1998, 17 (01) : 68 - 87
  • [3] Endocrine-modulating substances in the environment estrogenic effects of pharmaceutical products
    Arcand-Hoy, LD
    Nimrod, AC
    Benson, WH
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY, 1998, 17 (02) : 139 - 158
  • [4] Wildlife and endocrine disruptors: Requirements for hazard identification
    Campbell, PM
    Hutchinson, TH
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1998, 17 (01) : 127 - 135
  • [5] Identification of estrogenic chemicals in STW effluent. 1. Chemical fractionation and in vitro biological screening
    Desbrow, C
    Routledge, EJ
    Brighty, GC
    Sumpter, JP
    Waldock, M
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 32 (11) : 1549 - 1558
  • [6] *EUR CTR EC TOX CH, 1999, 39 ECETOC
  • [7] Folmar LC, 1996, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V104, P1096, DOI 10.1289/ehp.961041096
  • [8] Giesy JP, 1998, SETAC TECH PUBLICAT, P155
  • [9] Harries JE, 1997, ENVIRON TOXICOL CHEM, V16, P534, DOI [10.1002/etc.5620160320, 10.1897/1551-5028(1997)016&lt
  • [10] 0534:EAIFUK&gt