Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery

被引:259
作者
Jung, Sang Hun
Yu, Chang Sik [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Pyong Wha
Kim, Dae Dong
Park, In Ja
Kim, Hee Cheol
Kim, Jin Cheon
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Dept Surg, Coll Med, Colorectal Clin, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[2] Asan Med Ctr, Seoul 138736, South Korea
关键词
anastomotic leakage; rectal cancer surgery; risk factor; survival rate;
D O I
10.1007/s10350-008-9272-x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: The impact of anastomotic leakage on the long-term oncologic outcome is not clear. This retrospective study evaluated risk factors and oncologic impacts of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 1,391 patients who underwent sphincter preservation for rectal cancer between January 1997 and August 2003. Operations were classified as anterior resection (n=164), low anterior resection (n=898), or ultralow anterior resection (n=329). RESULTS: The anastomotic leakage rate was 2.5 percent. Multivariate analysis identified male (hazard ratio, 3.03), old age (hazard ratio, 2.42), and lower anastomosis level (hazard ratio, 2.68) as risk factors for leakage. The local recurrence rates were 9.6 and 2.2 percent for the leakage and nonleakage groups, respectively but were not significant (P=0.14). The overall five-year survival rates were 55.1 and 74.1 percent in the leakage and nonleakage groups, respectively (P < 0.05), and the cancer-specific survival rates were 63 and 78.3 percent in the leakage and nonleakage groups, respectively (P=0.05). However, in subgroup analysis, significant differences were identified only in Stage III patients. CONCLUSIONS: Age, sex, and ultralow anterior resection were found to be risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. In addition, leakage was associated with poor survival.
引用
收藏
页码:902 / 908
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
LOCAL RECURRENCE OF COLORECTAL-CANCER - THE PROBLEM, MECHANISMS, MANAGEMENT AND ADJUVANT THERAPY [J].
ABULAFI, AM ;
WILLIAMS, NS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (01) :7-19
[2]
PELVIC DRAINAGE AFTER ANTERIOR RESECTION OF THE RECTUM [J].
ALLENMERSH, TG ;
SPRAGUE, DB ;
MANN, CV ;
TURNER, MJ .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1989, 32 (03) :223-226
[3]
Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? [J].
Balkwill, F ;
Mantovani, A .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9255) :539-545
[4]
INTRAOPERATIVE AIR TESTING OF COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSES - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
BEARD, JD ;
NICHOLSON, ML ;
SAYERS, RD ;
LLOYD, D ;
EVERSON, NW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1990, 77 (10) :1095-1097
[5]
Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence [J].
Bell, SW ;
Walker, KG ;
Rickard, MJFX ;
Sinclair, G ;
Dent, OF ;
Chapuis, PH ;
Bokey, EL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (10) :1261-1266
[6]
Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery [J].
Branagan, G ;
Finnis, D .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2005, 48 (05) :1021-1026
[7]
Carlsen E, 1998, BRIT J SURG, V85, P526
[8]
Chang SC, 2003, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V50, P1898
[9]
DOUBLE STAPLING TECHNIQUE FOR LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION [J].
COHEN, Z ;
MYERS, E ;
LANGER, B ;
TAYLOR, B ;
RAILTON, RH ;
JAMIESON, C .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1983, 26 (04) :231-235
[10]
FERMOR B, 1986, J NATL CANCER I, V76, P347