Spatial Patterns of Modeled Climate Feedback and Contributions to Temperature Response and Polar Amplification

被引:106
作者
Crook, Julia A. [1 ]
Forster, Piers M. [1 ]
Stuber, Nicola [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Reading, Dept Meteorol, Reading, Berks, England
关键词
GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODELS; GREENHOUSE-PLUS FEEDBACK; SURFACE ALBEDO FEEDBACK; PART I; SENSITIVITY; FORCINGS;
D O I
10.1175/2011JCLI3863.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Spatial patterns of local climate feedback and equilibrium partial temperature responses are produced from eight general circulation models with slab oceans forced by doubling carbon dioxide (CO2). The analysis is extended to other forcing mechanisms with the Met Office Hadley Centre slab ocean climate model version 3 (HadSM3). In agreement with previous studies, the greatest intermodel differences are in the tropical cloud feedbacks. However, the greatest intermodel spread in the equilibrium temperature response comes from the water vapor plus lapse rate feedback, not clouds, disagreeing with a previous study. Although the surface albedo feedback contributes most in the annual mean to the greater warming of high latitudes, compared to the tropics (polar amplification), its effect is significantly ameliorated by shortwave cloud feedback. In different seasons the relative importance of the contributions varies considerably, with longwave cloudy-sky feedback and horizontal heat transport plus ocean heat release playing a major role during winter and autumn when polar amplification is greatest. The greatest intermodel spread in annual mean polar amplification is due to variations in horizontal heat transport and shortwave cloud feedback. Spatial patterns of local climate feedback for HadSM3 forced with 2 x CO2, +2% solar, low-level scattering aerosol and high-level absorbing aerosol are more similar than those for different models forced with 2 x CO2. However, the equilibrium temperature response to high-level absorbing aerosol shows considerably enhanced polar amplification compared to the other forcing mechanisms, largely due to differences in horizontal heat transport and water vapor plus lapse rate feedback, with the forcing itself acting to reduce amplification. Such variations in high-latitude response between models and forcing mechanisms make it difficult to infer specific causes of recent Arctic temperature change.
引用
收藏
页码:3575 / 3592
页数:18
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Polar amplification of surface warming on an aquaplanet in "ghost forcing" experiments without sea ice feedbacks
    Alexeev, VA
    Langen, PL
    Bates, JR
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2005, 24 (7-8) : 655 - 666
  • [2] CO2 forcing induces semi-direct effects with consequences for climate feedback interpretations
    Andrews, Timothy
    Forster, Piers M.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2008, 35 (04)
  • [3] Climate sensitivity and response
    Boer, GJ
    Yu, B
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2003, 20 (04) : 415 - 429
  • [4] How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes?
    Bony, Sandrine
    Colman, Robert
    Kattsov, Vladimir M.
    Allan, Richard P.
    Bretherton, Christopher S.
    Dufresne, Jean-Louis
    Hall, Alex
    Hallegatte, Stephane
    Holland, Marika M.
    Ingram, William
    Randall, David A.
    Soden, Brian J.
    Tselioudis, George
    Webb, Mark J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2006, 19 (15) : 3445 - 3482
  • [5] Dynamical greenhouse-plus feedback and polar warming amplification. Part I: A dry radiative-transportive climate model
    Cai, M
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2006, 26 (7-8) : 661 - 675
  • [6] Dynamical greenhouse-plus feedback and polar warming amplification. Part II: meridional and vertical asymmetries of the global warming
    Cai, Ming
    Lu, Jianhua
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2007, 29 (04) : 375 - 391
  • [7] Cloud feedback in atmospheric general circulation models: An update
    Cess, RD
    Zhang, MH
    Ingram, WJ
    Potter, GL
    Alskseev, V
    Barker, HW
    Cohen-Solal, E
    Colman, RA
    Dazlich, DA
    Del Genio, AD
    Dix, MR
    Dymnikov, V
    Esch, M
    Fowler, LD
    Fraser, JR
    Galin, V
    Gates, WL
    Hack, JJ
    Kiehl, JT
    Le Treut, H
    Lo, KKW
    McAvaney, BJ
    Meleshko, VP
    Morcrette, JJ
    Randall, DA
    Roeckner, E
    Royer, JF
    Schlesinger, ME
    Sporyshev, PV
    Timbal, B
    Volodin, EM
    Taylor, KE
    Wang, W
    Wetherald, RT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D8) : 12791 - 12794
  • [8] INTERCOMPARISON AND INTERPRETATION OF CLIMATE FEEDBACK PROCESSES IN 19 ATMOSPHERIC GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODELS
    CESS, RD
    POTTER, GL
    BLANCHET, JP
    BOER, GJ
    DELGENIO, AD
    DEQUE, M
    DYMNIKOV, V
    GALIN, V
    GATES, WL
    GHAN, SJ
    KIEHL, JT
    LACIS, AA
    LETREUT, H
    LI, ZX
    LIANG, XZ
    MCAVANEY, BJ
    MELESHKO, VP
    MITCHELL, JFB
    MORCRETTE, JJ
    RANDALL, DA
    RIKUS, L
    ROECKNER, E
    ROYER, JF
    SCHLESE, U
    SHEININ, DA
    SLINGO, A
    SOKOLOV, AP
    TAYLOR, KE
    WASHINGTON, WM
    WETHERALD, RT
    YAGAI, I
    ZHANG, MH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1990, 95 (D10) : 16601 - 16615
  • [9] Geographical contributions to global climate sensitivity in a General Circulation Model
    Colman, R
    [J]. GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2002, 32 (2-3) : 211 - 243
  • [10] A comparison of climate feedbacks in general circulation models
    Colman, R
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2003, 20 (7-8) : 865 - 873