Kalman Filter-Based CMORPH

被引:212
作者
Joyce, Robert J. [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Pingping [1 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Climate Predict Ctr, Camp Springs, MD 20746 USA
[2] Wyle Inc, Mclean, VA USA
关键词
MEASURING MISSION TRMM; PASSIVE MICROWAVE; GLOBAL PRECIPITATION; GAUGE OBSERVATIONS; SATELLITE-OBSERVATIONS; PRODUCTS; LAND;
D O I
10.1175/JHM-D-11-022.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
A Kalman filter (KF)-based Climate Prediction Center (CPC) morphing technique (CMORPH) algorithm is developed to integrate the passive microwave (PMW) precipitation estimates from low-Earth-orbit (LEO) satellites and infrared (IR) observations from geostationary (GEO) platforms. With the new algorithm, the precipitation analysis at a grid box of 8 x 8 km(2) is defined in three steps. First, PMW estimates of instantaneous rain rates closest to the target analysis time in both the forward and backward directions are propagated from their observation times to the analysis time using the cloud system advection vectors (CSAVs) computed from the GEO-IR images. The "prediction" of the precipitation analysis is then defined by averaging the forward- and backward-propagated PMW estimates with weights inversely proportional to their error variance. The IR-based precipitation estimates are incorporated if the gap between the two PMW observations is longer than 90 min. Validation tests showed substantial improvements of the KF-based CMORPH against the original version in both the pattern correlation and fidelity of probability density function (PDF) of the precipitation intensity. In general, performance of the original CMORPH degrades sharply with poor pattern correlation and substantially elevated (damped) frequency for light (heavy) precipitation events when PMW precipitation estimates are available from fewer LEO satellites. The KF-based CMORPH is capable of producing high-resolution precipitation analysis with much more stable performance with various levels of availability for the PMW observations.
引用
收藏
页码:1547 / 1563
页数:17
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
Adler R.F., 1994, Remote Sens. Rev, V11, P125, DOI [10.1080/02757259409532262, DOI 10.1080/02757259409532262]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ATMOSPHERIC MODELING
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 24 C HYDR ATL GA
[4]   REFAME: Rain Estimation Using Forward-Adjusted Advection of Microwave Estimates [J].
Behrangi, Ali ;
Imam, Bisher ;
Hsu, Kuolin ;
Sorooshian, Soroosh ;
Bellerby, Timothy J. ;
Huffman, George J. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2010, 11 (06) :1305-1321
[5]  
Dai A, 1999, J CLIMATE, V12, P2451, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<2451:EOCSMP>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   The frequency, intensity, and diurnal cycle of precipitation in surface and satellite observations over low- and mid-latitudes [J].
Dai, Aiguo ;
Lin, Xin ;
Hsu, Kuo-Lin .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2007, 29 (7-8) :727-744
[8]   Comparison of near-real-time precipitation estimates from satellite observations and numerical models [J].
Ebert, Elizabeth E. ;
Janowiak, John E. ;
Kidd, Chris .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 88 (01) :47-+
[9]   Precipitation characteristics over land from the NOAA-15 AMSU sensor [J].
Ferraro, RR ;
Weng, FH ;
Grody, NC ;
Zhao, LM .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2000, 27 (17) :2669-2672