Mycophenolate versus Azathioprine as Maintenance Therapy for Lupus Nephritis

被引:456
作者
Dooley, Mary Anne [2 ]
Jayne, David [3 ]
Ginzler, Ellen M. [5 ]
Isenberg, David [6 ]
Olsen, Nancy J. [7 ]
Wofsy, David [8 ,9 ]
Eitner, Frank [10 ]
Appel, Gerald B. [11 ]
Contreras, Gabriel [12 ]
Lisk, Laura [4 ]
Solomons, Neil [1 ]
机构
[1] Vifor Pharma, Clin Dept, Victoria, BC V8Z 7X8, Canada
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Addenbrookes Hosp, Renal Unit, Cambridge, England
[4] Vifor Pharma, Bagshot, Surrey, England
[5] Suny Downstate Med Ctr, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
[6] UCL, Dept Med, London WC1E 6BT, England
[7] Penn State Milton S Hershey Med Ctr, Div Rheumatol, Hershey, PA USA
[8] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Rheumatol, San Francisco, CA USA
[9] Univ Calif San Francisco, Rosalind Russell Med Res Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[10] Univ Aachen, Div Nephrol & Immunol, Rheinisch Westfal TH, D-5100 Aachen, Germany
[11] Columbia Univ, Dept Nephrol, New York, NY USA
[12] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Div Nephrol & Hypertens, Miami, FL 33136 USA
关键词
INTRAVENOUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; INDUCTION TREATMENT; DISEASE-ACTIVITY; RENAL-DISEASE; LONG-TERM; MOFETIL; ERYTHEMATOSUS; MANAGEMENT; TRIALS; ALMS;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa1014460
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Maintenance therapy, often with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, is required to consolidate remission and prevent relapse after the initial control of lupus nephritis. METHODS We carried out a 36-month, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 study comparing oral mycophenolate mofetil (2 g per day) and oral azathioprine (2 mg per kilogram of body weight per day), plus placebo in each group, in patients who met response criteria during a 6-month induction trial. The study group underwent repeat randomization in a 1: 1 ratio. Up to 10 mg of prednisone per day or its equivalent was permitted. The primary efficacy end point was the time to treatment failure, which was defined as death, end-stage renal disease, doubling of the serum creatinine level, renal flare, or rescue therapy for lupus nephritis. Secondary assessments included the time to the individual components of treatment failure and adverse events. RESULTS A total of 227 patients were randomly assigned to maintenance treatment (116 to mycophenolate mofetil and 111 to azathioprine). Mycophenolate mofetil was superior to azathioprine with respect to the primary end point, time to treatment failure (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 0.77; P=0.003), and with respect to time to renal flare and time to rescue therapy (hazard ratio, <1.00; P<0.05). Observed rates of treatment failure were 16.4% (19 of 116 patients) in the mycophenolate mofetil group and 32.4% (36 of 111) in the azathioprine group. Adverse events, most commonly minor infections and gastrointestinal disorders, occurred in more than 95% of the patients in both groups (P=0.68). Serious adverse events occurred in 33.3% of patients in the azathioprine group and in 23.5% of those in the mycophenolate mofetil group (P=0.11), and the rate of withdrawal due to adverse events was higher with azathioprine than with mycophenolate mofetil (39.6% vs. 25.2%, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS Mycophenolate mofetil was superior to azathioprine in maintaining a renal response to treatment and in preventing relapse in patients with lupus nephritis who had a response to induction therapy. (Funded by Vifor Pharma [formerly Aspreva]; ALMS
引用
收藏
页码:1886 / 1895
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Cyclophosphamide for Induction Treatment of Lupus Nephritis [J].
Appel, Gerald B. ;
Contreras, Gabriel ;
Dooley, Mary Anne ;
Ginzler, Ellen M. ;
Isenberg, David ;
Jayne, David ;
Li, Lei-Shi ;
Mysler, Eduardo ;
Sanchez-Guerrero, Jorge ;
Solomons, Neil ;
Wofsy, David .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2009, 20 (05) :1103-1112
[2]   Updates on the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis [J].
Bomback, Andrew S. ;
Appel, Gerald B. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 21 (12) :2028-2035
[3]   Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis [J].
Chan, TM ;
Li, FK ;
Tang, CSO ;
Wong, RWS ;
Fang, GX ;
Ji, YL ;
Lau, CS ;
Wong, AKM ;
Tong, MKL ;
Chan, KW ;
Lai, KN .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (16) :1156-1162
[4]   Long-term study of mycophenolate mofetil as continuous induction and maintenance treatment for diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis [J].
Chan, TM ;
Tse, KC ;
Tang, CSO ;
Mok, MY ;
Li, FK .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 16 (04) :1076-1084
[5]   Lupus nephritis: induction therapy [J].
Chan, TM .
LUPUS, 2005, 14 :S27-S32
[6]   Sequential therapies for proliferative lupus nephritis [J].
Contreras, G ;
Pardo, V ;
Leclercq, B ;
Lenz, O ;
Tozman, E ;
O'Nan, P ;
Roth, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (10) :971-980
[7]   Treatment of diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Flanc, RS ;
Roberts, MA ;
Strippoli, GFM ;
Chadban, SJ ;
Kerr, PG ;
Atkins, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2004, 43 (02) :197-208
[8]  
Ginzler E, 2010, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V62, P3005
[9]   Nonrenal Disease Activity Following Mycophenolate Mofetil or Intravenous Cyclophosphamide as Induction Treatment for Lupus Nephritis [J].
Ginzler, Ellen M. ;
Wofsy, David ;
Isenberg, David ;
Gordon, Caroline ;
Lisk, Laura ;
Dooley, Mary-Anne .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2010, 62 (01) :211-221
[10]   Mycophenolate mofetil or intravenous cyclophosphamide for lupus nephritis [J].
Ginzler, EM ;
Dooley, MA ;
Aranow, C ;
Kim, MY ;
Buyon, J ;
Merrill, JT ;
Petri, M ;
Gilkeson, GS ;
Wallace, DJ ;
Weisman, MH ;
Appel, GB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (21) :2219-2228