Assessing Impacts of Payments for Watershed Services on Sustainability in Coupled Human and Natural Systems

被引:39
作者
Asbjornsen, Heidi [1 ,2 ]
Mayer, Alex S. [5 ]
Jones, Kelly W. [6 ]
Selfa, Theresa [7 ]
Saenz, Leonardo [8 ]
Kolka, Randall K. [9 ]
Halvorsen, Kathleen E. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Hampshire, Dept Nat Resources & Environm, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[2] Univ New Hampshire, Earth Syst Res Ctr, Inst Earth Oceans & Space, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[3] Michigan Technol Univ, Dept Social Sci, Houghton, MI 49931 USA
[4] Michigan Technol Univ, Sch Forest Resources & Environm Sci, Houghton, MI 49931 USA
[5] Michigan Technol Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Houghton, MI 49931 USA
[6] Colorado State Univ, Dept Human Dimens Nat Resources, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[7] SUNY Syracuse, Coll Environm Sci & Forestry, Dept Environm Studies, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
[8] Conservat Int, Washington, DC USA
[9] USDA, No Res Stn, Forest Serv, Grand Rapids, MI USA
关键词
payments for ecosystem services; water quality and quantity; indicators; monitoring and evaluation; interdisciplinary research; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; DESIGNING PAYMENTS; SOCIO-HYDROLOGY; LAND-USE; FRAMEWORK; POVERTY; VULNERABILITY; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1093/biosci/biv051
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Payments for watershed services (PWS) as a policy tool for enhancing water quality and supply have gained momentum in recent years, but their ability to lead to sustainable watershed outcomes is uncertain. Consequently, the demand for effective monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of PWS impacts on coupled human and natural systems (CHANS) and their implications for watershed sustainability (WS) is increasing. The theoretical foundations and practical applications of WS frameworks, which integrate biophysical and socioeconomic indicators to assess progress toward WS goals, have been extensively explored but rarely applied to PWS. We develop the PWS-WS framework as an approach for guiding indicator selection to improve knowledge about the complex drivers, interactions, and feedback between PWS and CHANS. A review of the PWS and WS literatures provides a basis for comparing and contrasting indicators. Using two case studies, we illustrate how applying the PWS-WS framework using a place-based, contextualized approach enhances potential for sustainable watershed outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 591
页数:13
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, FOREST WATER PEOPLE
[2]  
[Anonymous], GOVERNANCE POLITY
[3]  
Baron JS, 2002, ECOL APPL, V12, P1247
[4]  
Binder CR, 2013, ECOLOGY SOC, V18
[5]   The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services [J].
Brauman, Kate A. ;
Daily, Gretchen C. ;
Duarte, T. Kaeo ;
Mooney, Harold A. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2007, 32 :67-98
[6]   Meta-analysis of institutional-economic factors explaining the environmental performance of payments for watershed services [J].
Brouwer, Roy ;
Tesfaye, Abonesh ;
Pauw, Pieter .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 38 (04) :380-392
[7]  
BRUIJNZEEL LA, 2005, INT HYDROL SER, P906
[8]   Incentives, land use, and ecosystem services: Synthesizing complex linkages [J].
Bryan, Brett A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2013, 27 :124-134
[9]   Payments for ecosystem services and poverty reduction: concepts, issues, and empirical perspectives [J].
Bulte, Erwin H. ;
Lipper, Leslie ;
Stringer, Randy ;
Zilberman, David .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2008, 13 :245-254
[10]   An integrated indicator based on basin hydrology, environment, life, and policy: The watershed sustainability index [J].
Chaves, Henrique M. L. ;
Alipaz, Suzana .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2007, 21 (05) :883-895