A new marked point process model for the federal funds rate target - Methodology and forecast evaluation

被引:12
作者
Grammig, Joachim [1 ]
Kehrle, Kerstin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Dept Econometr & Empir Econ, D-72074 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
marked point process; autoregressive conditional hazard model; autoregressive conditional multinomial model; probability forecast; forecast evaluation;
D O I
10.1016/j.jedc.2008.02.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Forecasts of key interest rates set by central banks are of paramount concern for investors and policy makers. Recently it has been shown that forecasts of the federal funds rate target, the most anticipated indicator of the Federal Reserve Bank's monetary policy stance, can be improved considerably when its evolution is modeled as a marked point process (MPP). This is due to the fact that target changes occur in discrete time with discrete increments, have an autoregressive nature and are usually in the same direction. We propose a model which is able to account for these dynamic features of the data. In particular, we combine Hamilton and Jorda's [2002. A model for the federal funds rate target. Journal of Political Economy 110(5), 1135-1167] autoregressive conditional hazard (ACH) and Russell and Engle's [2005. A discrete-state continuous-time model of financial transactions prices and times: the autoregressive conditional multinomial-autoregressive conditional duration model. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 23(2), 166 - 180] autoregressive conditional multinomial (ACM) model. The paper also puts forth a methodology to evaluate probability function forecasts of MPP models. By improving goodness of fit and point forecasts of the target, the ACH-ACM qualifies as a sensible modeling framework. Furthermore, our results show that NIPP models deliver useful probability function forecasts at short and medium term horizons. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2370 / 2396
页数:27
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   A comparison of financial duration models via density forecasts [J].
Bauwens, L ;
Giot, P ;
Grammig, J ;
Veredas, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2004, 20 (04) :589-609
[2]   Measuring monetary policy interdependence [J].
Bergin, PR ;
Jordà, O .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2004, 23 (05) :761-783
[3]  
BERNANKE BS, 1992, AM ECON REV, V82, P901
[4]   The liquidity effect in the federal funds market: Evidence from daily open market operations [J].
Carpenter, Seth ;
Demiralp, Selva .
JOURNAL OF MONEY CREDIT AND BANKING, 2006, 38 (04) :901-920
[5]  
Carstensen K., 2006, German Economic Review, V7, P1, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-0475.2006.00145.X
[6]   Why are prices sticky? The dynamics of wholesale gasoline prices [J].
Davis, MC ;
Hamilton, JD .
JOURNAL OF MONEY CREDIT AND BANKING, 2004, 36 (01) :17-37
[7]   The operations of the Bank of England, 1890-1908: A dynamic probit approach [J].
Davutyan, N ;
Parke, WR .
JOURNAL OF MONEY CREDIT AND BANKING, 1995, 27 (04) :1099-1112
[8]  
DEMIRALP S, 1999, 9906 UC DAVIS
[9]   Constraints on concordance measures in bivariate discrete data [J].
Denuit, M ;
Lambert, P .
JOURNAL OF MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS, 2005, 93 (01) :40-57
[10]   Evaluating density forecasts with applications to financial risk management [J].
Diebold, FX ;
Gunther, TA ;
Tay, AS .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 39 (04) :863-883